Refugees, legitimacy and development

Ethics & Global Politics

卷:14

David Owen¹ 

[1] University of Southampton;

关键词: refugees;    development;    autonomy;    political rights;    legitimacy;    humanitarianism;   

DOI  :  10.1080/16544951.2021.1926082

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

In this paper I focus on Gillian Brock’s treatment of the case of refugees. After noting a potential distinction between our otherwise closely related theoretical approaches in which we view the refugee regime as a legitimacy repair (Owen) or legitimacy correction (Brock) mechanism, I draw a contrast between our ways of addressing this regime and argue that the difference between my historical approach and Brock’s presentist approach turns out to have implications for how we conceive what is due to refugees. Focusing on her advocacy of a developmental turn in refugee protection, I develop the concern that her articulation of this approach remains too closely tied to the humanitarian perspective of Betts and Collier in a way that underestimates the significance of political rights to refugee autonomy.

【 授权许可】

Unknown