Research Ethics | |
Exceptions to blanket anonymity for the publication of interviews with refugees: African refugees in Israel as a case study: | |
MollieGerver1  | |
关键词: anonymity; autonomy; consent; interviewing; Israel; refugees; | |
DOI : 10.1177/1747016113481176 | |
学科分类:医学(综合) | |
来源: Sage Journals | |
【 摘 要 】
Literature on the ethics of researching refugees, both as participants and partners, presents strong arguments for why anonymity is the safer option in the event of questionable consent. However, blanket anonymity, without asking refugee interviewees if they wish to be anonymous, may cause more harm than good in certain contexts. One such context which this article will explore is the context of Israel, where a working Refugee Status Determination (RSD) system has yet to be established. This case study highlights that, even in extreme circumstances where identity exposure can create risks, there may be a case for allowing identity exposure and perhaps an obligation on the part of the researcher to publish a name if this is the strong wish of the interviewee. This article builds on literature addressing confidentiality of identities (Duvell et al., 2010; Giordano et al., 2007; Kelly, 2009; Lahman et al., 2011; Lee, 1993; Mackenzie et al., 2007; Pittaway et al., 2010) and literature addressing informed cons...
【 授权许可】
CC BY
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO201904025699634ZK.pdf | 641KB | download |