Validity of anthropometric equations to estimate infant fat mass at birth and in early infancy

BMC Pediatrics

Research Article

Jennifer S. Cauble¹  Holly R. Hull¹  Mira Dewi¹ 

[1] Department of Dietetics and Nutrition, School of Health Professions, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow BLVD, Mail Stop 4013, 66160, Kansas City, KS, USA;

关键词: Prediction equations;    Infant;    Fat mass;    Anthropometrics;    ADP;    Skinfolds;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12887-017-0844-6

 received in 2016-04-01, accepted in 2017-03-21,  发布年份 2017

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundIn newborns and children, body fat estimation equations are often used at different ages than the age used to develop the equations. Limited validation studies exist for newborn body fat estimation equations at birth or later in infancy. The study purpose was to validate 4 newborn fat mass (FM) estimation equations in comparison to FM measured by air displacement plethysmography (ADP; the Pea Pod) at birth and 3 months.MethodsNinety-five newborns (1–3 days) had their body composition measured by ADP and anthropometrics assessed by skinfolds. Sixty-three infants had repeat measures taken (3 months). FM measured by ADP was compared to FM from the skinfold estimation equations (Deierlein, Catalano, Lingwood, and Aris). Paired t-tests assessed mean differences, linear regression assessed accuracy, precision was assessed by R2 and standard error of the estimate (SEE), and bias was assessed by Bland-Altman plots.ResultsAt birth, FM measured by ADP differed from FM estimated by Deierlein, Lingwood and Aris equations, but did not differ from the Catalano equation. At 3 months, FM measured by ADP was different from all equations. At both time points, poor precision and accuracy was detected. Bias was detected in most all equations.ConclusionsPoor agreement, precision, and accuracy were found between prediction equations and the criterion at birth and 3 months.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2017