期刊论文详细信息
Cardiovascular Diabetology
Long-term cardiovascular outcomes of biodegradable polymer drug eluting stents in patients with diabetes versus non-diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis
Review
Quannan Zu1  Ming Lu1  Hong Wang2  Hairong Tang2  Rongfa Chen3  Zhiren Yang3 
[1] College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, 300072, Tianjin, P. R. China;Department of Cardiology, The People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, 530021, Nanning, Guangxi, P. R. China;The State Key Laboratory Management and Control for Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100190, Beijing, P. R. China;
关键词: Biodegradable polymer drug eluting stents;    Durable polymer drug eluting stents;    Percutaneous coronary intervention;    Diabetes mellitus;    Cardiovascular diseases;    Stent thrombosis;    Revascularization;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12933-023-01962-w
 received in 2023-02-20, accepted in 2023-08-12,  发布年份 2023
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundToday, diabetes mellitus (DM) has become a worldwide concern. DM is a major risk factor for the development of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Eligible patients with CVD are treated invasively by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) whereby a stent is implanted inside the coronary vessel with the particular lesion to allow sufficient blood flow. Newer scientific research have shown that even though associated with a lower rate of re-stenosis, first-generation drug eluting stents (DES) were associated with a higher rate of late stent thrombosis. Recently, newer stents, namely biodegradable polymer DES (BP-DES) have been developed to overcome the safety issues of earlier generation DES. In this analysis we aimed to systematically compare the long term (≥ 12 months) adverse cardiovascular outcomes observed in DM versus non-DM patients who were implanted with BP-DES.MethodsCochrane central, MEDLINE (Subset PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov and Google scholar were searched for relevant publications involving BP-DES in patients with DM versus non-DM and their associated adverse cardiovascular outcomes. The mean follow-up time period ranged from 12 to 120 months. Data analysis was carried out with the latest version of the RevMan software (version 5.4). Based on the Mantel-Haenszel test, risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated and used to represent the results following analysis.ResultsSeven (7) studies with a total number of 10,246 participants were included in this analysis. Stents which were implanted during PCI were BP-DES. Participants were enrolled from the year 2006 to 2013. Our current results showed that in patients who were implanted with BP-DES, the risks of major adverse cardiac events (RR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.18–1.43; P = 0.00001), myocardial infarction (RR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.14–1.93; P = 0.003), all-cause mortality (RR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.29–2.23; P = 0.0002), cardiac death (RR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.28–2.93; P = 0.002), target vessel revascularization (RR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.03–1.77; P = 0.03), target lesion revascularization (RR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.07–1.54; P = 0.007) and target lesion failure (RR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.52–2.12; P = 0.00001) were significantly higher in the DM group. Definite and probable stent thrombosis (RR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.28–2.55; P = 0.0009) were also significantly higher in the DM group.ConclusionsDiabetes mellitus was an independent risk factor associated with long term adverse cardiovascular outcomes following PCI with BP-DES.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202309151743459ZK.pdf 1298KB PDF download
Fig. 5 281KB Image download
Fig. 3 1005KB Image download
Fig. 5 1331KB Image download
Fig. 1 180KB Image download
Fig. 6 669KB Image download
Fig. 3 116KB Image download
Fig. 5 37KB Image download
Fig. 2 101KB Image download
12862_2023_2148_Article_IEq5.gif 1KB Image download
【 图 表 】

12862_2023_2148_Article_IEq5.gif

Fig. 2

Fig. 5

Fig. 3

Fig. 6

Fig. 1

Fig. 5

Fig. 3

Fig. 5

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:3次 浏览次数:1次