期刊论文详细信息
PeerJ
Elemental analysis by Metallobalance provides a complementary support layer over existing blood biochemistry panel-based cancer risk assessment
article
Miho Kusakabe1  Masahiro Sato2  Yohko Nakamura2  Haruo Mikami2  Jason Lin3  Hiroki Nagase1 
[1] Graduate School of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University;Cancer Prevention Center, Chiba Cancer Center Research Institute;Division of Clinical Genomics, Chiba Cancer Center Research Institute;Division of Cancer Genetics, Chiba Cancer Center Research Institute
关键词: Cancer biology;    Chemical biology;    Epidemiology;    Mass spectrometry;    Preventative medicine;   
DOI  :  10.7717/peerj.12247
学科分类:社会科学、人文和艺术(综合)
来源: Inra
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Despite the benefit of early cancer screening, Japan has one of the lowest cancer screening rates among developed countries, possibly due to there being a lack of “a good test” that can provide sufficient levels of test sensitivity and accuracy without a large price tag. As a number of essential and trace elements have been intimately connected to the oncogenesis of cancer, Metallobalance, a recent development in elemental analysis utilizing the technique of inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry has been developed and tested as a robust method for arrayed cancer risk screening. We have conducted case-control epidemiological studies in the prefecture of Chiba, in the Greater Tokyo Area, and sought to determine both Metallobalance screening’s effectiveness for predicting pan-cancer outcomes, and whether the method is capable enough to replace the more conventional antigen-based testing methods. Results suggest that MB screening provides some means of classification potential among cancer and non-cancer cases, and may work well as a complementary method to traditional antigen-based tumor marker testing, even in situations where tumor markers alone cannot discernibly identify cancer from non-cancer cases.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202307100005195ZK.pdf 2950KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:9次 浏览次数:0次