期刊论文详细信息
BMC Public Health
Emotional response patterns, mental health, and structural vulnerability during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada: a latent class analysis
Research
Trevor Goodyear1  Corey McAuliffe1  Emily K. Jenkins1  Zachary Daly1  Allie Slemon1  Javiera Pumarino2  Chris Richardson3  Anne Gadermann4  Kimberly C. Thomson4 
[1] School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, T201-2211 Wesbrook Mall, V6T 2B5, Vancouver, BC, Canada;School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada;School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada;Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St. Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, Canada;School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada;Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St. Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, Canada;Human Early Learning Partnership, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada;
关键词: Mental health;    Emotions;    Covid-19;    Public health;    Social determinants of health;    Structural vulnerability;    Social inequities;    Cross-sectional survey;    Latent class analysis;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12889-022-14798-y
 received in 2022-05-10, accepted in 2022-12-02,  发布年份 2022
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has contributed to increases in negative emotions such as fear, worry, and loneliness, as well as changes in positive emotions, including calmness and hopefulness. Alongside these complex emotional changes has been an inequitable worsening of population mental health, with many people experiencing suicidal ideation and using substances to cope. This study examines how patterns of co-occurring positive and negative emotions relate to structural vulnerability and mental health amid the pandemic.MethodsData are drawn from a cross-sectional monitoring survey (January 22–28, 2021) on the mental health of adults in Canada during the pandemic. Latent class analysis was used to group participants (N = 3009) by emotional response pattern types. Descriptive statistics, bivariate cross-tabulations, and multivariable logistic regression were used to characterize each class while quantifying associations with suicidal ideation and increased use of substances to cope.ResultsA four-class model was identified as the best fit in this latent class analysis. This included the most at-risk Class 1 (15.6%; high negative emotions, low positive emotions), the mixed-risk Class 2 (7.1%; high negative emotions, high positive emotions), the norm/reference Class 3 (50.5%; moderate negative emotions, low positive emotions), and the most protected Class 4 (26.8% low negative emotions, high positive emotions). The most at-risk class disproportionately included people who were younger, with lower incomes, and with pre-existing mental health conditions. They were most likely to report not coping well (48.5%), deteriorated mental health (84.2%), suicidal ideation (21.5%), and increased use of substances to cope (27.2%). Compared to the norm/reference class, being in the most at-risk class was associated with suicidal ideation (OR = 2.84; 95% CI = 2.12, 3.80) and increased use of substances to cope (OR = 4.64; 95% CI = 3.19, 6.75).ConclusionsThis study identified that adults experiencing structural vulnerabilities were disproportionately represented in a latent class characterized by high negative emotions and low positive emotions amid the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada. Membership in this class was associated with higher risk for adverse mental health outcomes, including suicidal ideation and increased use of substances to cope. Tailored population-level responses are needed to promote positive coping and redress mental health inequities throughout the pandemic and beyond.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2022

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202305061987914ZK.pdf 1145KB PDF download
Fig. 6 702KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 6

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:2次 浏览次数:0次