Drone versus ambulance for blood products transportation: an economic evaluation study

BMC Health Services Research

M. A. Zailani¹  R. Z. Azma¹  A. R. Rahana¹  I. Aniza¹  M. S. Ismail¹  Z. A. Mahdy¹  I. S. Shahnaz²  K. S. Chan³  M. Jamaludin³ 

[1] Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia;Queen Elizabeth II Hospital (QEHII), Ministry of Health (MOH), Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia;Sabah Women and Children Hospital (SWACH), Ministry of Health (MOH), Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia;

关键词: Drone;    Blood;    Transportation;    Malaysia;    Economy;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12913-021-07321-3

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundMedical transportation is an essential step in health care services, and includes ground, air and water transportation. Among the important uses of medical transportation is the delivery of blood products in the event of a clinical emergency. Drone technology is the latest technological advancement that may revolutionize medical transportation globally. Nonetheless, its economic evaluation is scant and insufficient, whilst its cost-effectiveness remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of drone transportation versus the ambulance.MethodsThe setting of the study was within a developing nation. An economic evaluation study of drone versus ambulance for emergency blood products transportation between the Sabah Women and Children Hospital (SWACH) and the Queen Elizabeth II Hospital (QEH2) on Borneo Island was conducted using the Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) technique. The total cost of each mode of transportation was calculated using the Activity Based Costing (ABC) method. Travel time was used as a denominator to estimate the Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER).ResultsFor one clinical emergency in SWACH, a round trip of blood products transportation from SWACH to QEH2 costs RM1,266.02 (USD307.09) when using the ambulance, while the drone costs RM1,313.28 (USD319.36). The travel time for the drone was much shorter (18 min) compared to the ambulance (34 min). The Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (CER) of ambulance transportation was RM37.23 (USD9.05) per minute whilst the CER of drone transportation was RM72.96 (USD17.74) per minute. The ICER of drone versus ambulance was − 2.95, implying an increase of RM2.95 in cost for every minute saved using a drone instead of an ambulance.ConclusionAlthough drone transportation of blood products costs more per minute compared to the ambulance, the significantly shorter transport time of the drone offset its cost. Thus, we believe there is good economic potential for drone usage for blood products transportation in developing nations particularly if the drone price decreases and its operational lifespan increases. Our limitation of a non-clinical denominator used in this study leads to the recommendation for use of clinical outcomes in future studies.

【 授权许可】

CC BY