期刊论文详细信息
Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
Comparison of capillary electrophoresis and high performance liquid chromatography methods for caffeine determination in decaffeinated coffee
Carolina Schaper Bizzotto1  Adriana Dillenburg Meinhart1  Cristiano Augusto Ballus1  Gislaine Ghiselli1  Helena Teixeira Godoy1 
[1] ,University of Campinas Faculty of Food Engineering Department of Food ScienceCampinas SP ,Brasil
关键词: caffeine;    capillary electrophoresis;    HPLC;    method comparison;    decaffeinated coffee;    cafeína;    eletroforese capilar;    HPLC;    comparação de métodos;    café descafeinado;   
DOI  :  10.1590/S0101-20612013005000013
来源: SciELO
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Decaffeinated coffee accounts for 10 percent of coffee sales in the world; it is preferred by consumers that do not wish or are sensitive to caffeine effects. This article presents an analytical comparison of capillary electrophoresis (CE) and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods for residual caffeine quantification in decaffeinated coffee in terms of validation parameters, costs, analysis time, composition and treatment of the residues generated, and caffeine quantification in 20 commercial samples. Both methods showed suitable validation parameters. Caffeine content did not differ statistically in the two different methods of analysis. The main advantage of the high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method was the 42-fold lower detection limit. Nevertheless, the capillary electrophoresis (CE) detection limit was 115-fold lower than the allowable limit by the Brazilian law. The capillary electrophoresis (CE) analyses were 30% faster, the reagent costs were 76.5-fold, and the volume of the residues generated was 33-fold lower. Therefore, the capillary electrophoresis (CE) method proved to be a valuable analytical tool for this type of analysis.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
 All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202103040081131ZK.pdf 347KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:7次 浏览次数:8次