Axillary lymph node dose with tangential whole breast radiation in the prone versus supine position: a dosimetric study

Radiation Oncology

Thomas A DiPetrillo²  David E Wazer²  Jessica R Hiatt²  Jaroslaw T Hepel²  David Solomon¹  Kara Lynne Leonard¹ 

[1] Department of Radiation Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Box #593 800, Washington St, Boston, MA, 02111, USA;Department of Radiation Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert School of Medicine of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA

关键词: ACOSOG Z0011;    Radiation;    Axillary lymph nodes;    Prone;    Breast cancer;   

Others  :  1160844
DOI  :  10.1186/1748-717X-7-72

 received in 2012-01-13, accepted in 2012-04-30,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Prone breast positioning reduces skin reaction and heart and lung dose, but may also reduce radiation dose to axillary lymph nodes (ALNs).

Methods

Women with early stage breast cancer treated with whole breast irradiation (WBI) in the prone position were identified. Patients treated in the supine position were matched for treating physician, laterality, and fractionation. Ipsilateral breast, tumor bed, and Level I, II, and III ALNs were contoured according to the RTOG breast atlas. Clips marking surgically removed sentinel lymph nodes (SLN)s were contoured. Treatment plans developed for each patient were retrospectively analyzed. V90_% and V95_% was calculated for each axillary level. When present, dose to axillary surgical clips was calculated.

Results

Treatment plans for 46 women (23 prone and 23 supine) were reviewed. The mean V90_% and V95_% of ALN Level I was significantly lower for patients treated in the prone position (21% and 14%, respectively) than in the supine position (50% and 37%, respectively) (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Generally, Level II & III ALNs received little dose in either position. Sentinel node biopsy clips were all contained within axillary Level I. The mean V95_% of SLN clips was 47% for patients treated in the supine position and 0% for patients treated in the prone position (p < 0.0001). Mean V90_% to SLN clips was 96% for women treated in the supine position but only 13% for women treated in the prone position.

Conclusions

Standard tangential breast irradiation in the prone position results in substantially reduced dose to the Level I axilla as compared with treatment in the supine position. For women in whom axillary coverage is indicated such as those with positive sentinel lymph node biopsy who do not undergo completion axillary dissection, treatment in the prone position may be inappropriate.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Leonard et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Giuliano AE, McCall L, Beitsch P, et al.: Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial. Ann Surg 2010, 252:426-433.
• [2]Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, et al.: Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis. JAMA 2011, 305:569-575.
• [3]Krasin M, McCall A, King S, et al.: Evaluation of a standard breast tangent technique: A dose-volume analysis of tangential irradiation using three-dimensional tools. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000, 47:327-333.
• [4]Aristei C, Chionne F, Marsella AR, et al.: Evaluation of level I and II axillary nodes included in the standard breast tangential fields and calculation of the administered dose: Results of a prospective study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001, 51:69-73.
• [5]Takeda A, Shigematsu N, Ikeda T, et al.: Evaluation of novel modified tangential irradiation technique for breast cancer patients using dose–volume histograms. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004, 58:1280-1288.
• [6]Orecchia R, Huscher A, Leonardi MC, et al.: Irradiation with standard tangential breast fields in patients treated with conservative surgery and sentinel node biopsy: Using a three-dimensional tool to evaluate the first level coverage of the axillary nodes. Br J Radiol 2005, 78:51-54.
• [7]Reznik J, Cicchetti MG, Degaspe B, et al.: Analysis of axillary coverage during tangential radiation therapy to the breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005, 61:163-168.
• [8]Reed DR, Lindsley SK, Mann GN, et al.: Axillary lymph node dose with tangential breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005, 61:358-364.
• [9]Alonso-Basanta M, Ko J, Babcock M, et al.: Coverage of axillary lymph nodes in supine vs. prone breast radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009, 73:745-751.
• [10]Schlembach PJ, Buchholz TA, Ross MI, et al.: Relationship of sentinel and axillary Level I-II lymph nodes to tangential fields used in breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001, 51:671-678.
• [11]McCormick B, Botnick M, Hunt M, et al.: Are the axillary lymph nodes treated by standard tangent breast fields? J Surg Oncol 2002, 81:12-16.
• [12]Chung MA, DiPetrillo T, Hernandez S, et al.: Treatment of the axilla by tangential breast radiotherapy in women with invasive breast cancer. Am J Surg 2002, 184:401-402.
• [13]Goodman RL, Grann A, Saracco P, et al.: The relationship between radiation fields and regional lymph nodes in carcinoma of the breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001, 50:99-105.
• [14]Merchant TE, McCormick B: Prone position breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol BiolPhys 1994, 30:197-203.
• [15]Formenti SC, Gidea-Addeo D, Goldberg JD, et al.: Phase I–II trial of prone accelerated intensity modulated radiation therapy to the breast to optimally spare normal tissue. J Clin Oncol 2007, 25:2236-2242.
• [16]Griem KL, Fetherston P, Kuznetsova M, et al.: Three-dimensional photon dosimetry: a comparison of treatment of the intact breast in the supine and prone position. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003, 57:891-899.
• [17]Kirby AM, Evans PM, Donovan EM, et al.: Prone versus supine positioning for whole and partial-breast radiotherapy: A comparison of non-target tissue dosimetry. Radiother Oncol 2010, 96:178-184.
• [18]Stegman LD, Beal KP, Hunt MA, et al.: Long-term clinical outcomes of whole-breast irradiation delivered in the prone position. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007, 68:73-81.
• [19]Ramella S, Trodella L, Ippolito E, et al.: Whole-Breast Irradiation: A Subgroup Analysis of Criteria to Stratify for Prone Position Treatment. Med Dosim 2011. Epub ahead of print
• [20]Whelan T, Pignol JP, Levine MN, et al.: Long-term results of hypofractionated radiation therapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2010, 362:513-520.
• [21]Xa LI, Tai A, Arthur DW, et al.: Variability of target and normal structure delineation for breast cancer radiotherapy: An RTOG multi-institutional and multiobserver study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009, 73:944-951.
• [22]Whelan TJ, Olivotto I, Acherman I, et al.: NCIC-CTG MA.20: An intergroup trial of regional nodal irradiation in eraly breast cancer. J Clin Oncol [abstract] 2011., 29Sabstr LBA 1003
• [23]Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group (EBCTCG), et al.: Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10 801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet 2011, 366:2087-2106.