Journal of Medical Case Reports | |
Neuromyelitis optica presenting with relapses under treatment with natalizumab: a case report | |
Ralf Andreas Linker2  Stefan Schwab2  Christian Maihöfner2  Tobias Struffert1  Anne Waschbisch2  Alexandra B Laemmer2  De-Hyung Lee2  | |
[1] Department of Neuroradiology, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany;Department of Neurology, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany | |
关键词: Seroconversion; Anti-AQP-4 antibodies; Rituxan; Multiple sclerosis; Natalizumab; Neuromyelitis optica; | |
Others : 820935 DOI : 10.1186/1752-1947-8-155 |
|
received in 2013-12-30, accepted in 2014-03-17, 发布年份 2014 | |
【 摘 要 】
Introduction
Neuromyelitis optica is an inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. To date, optimal therapeutic approaches for neuromyelitis optica have yet to be defined. Natalizumab is highly effective in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and might be considered as an option.
Case presentation
Here, we describe a 67-year-old Caucasian man with definite neuromyelitis optica with detection of anti-aquaporin-4 antibodies over the course of the disease. After initially discussing the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis at an outside hospital, our patient received interferon beta 1a as well as repeated corticosteroid pulses without success. Under subsequent therapy with natalizumab, he continued to present relapses. It was not until discontinuation of natalizumab, repeated cycles of plasma exchanges and initiation of therapy with rituxan that the disease course started to stabilize. Although B cells were completely depleted, our patient experienced another severe myelitis relapse during further follow-up and an additional immunosuppressive therapy with cyclophosphamide was started. Under this regimen, no further relapses occurred over the next 24 months.
Conclusions
This case adds further evidence to the previously discussed notion that natalizumab, while highly effective in multiple sclerosis, may not work sufficiently in neuromyelitis optica. It further advocates for repetitive testing of anti-aquaporin-4 antibodies before and after treatment initiation.
【 授权许可】
2014 Lee et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
20140712061756689.pdf | 362KB | download | |
Figure 1. | 92KB | Image | download |
【 图 表 】
Figure 1.
【 参考文献 】
- [1]Wingerchuk DM, Lennon VA, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF, Weinshenker BG: Revised diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica. Neurology 2006, 66:1485-1489.
- [2]Lennon VA, Kryzer TJ, Pittock SJ, Verkman AS, Hinson SR: IgG marker of optic- spinal multiple sclerosis binds to the aquaporin-4 water channel. J Exp Med 2005, 204:473-477.
- [3]Papeix C, Vidal JS, de Seze J, Pierrot-Deseilligny C, Tourbah A, Stankoff B, Lebrun C, Moreau T, Vermersch P, Fontaine B, Lyon-Caen O, Gout O: Immunosuppressive therapy is more effective than interferon in neuromyelitis optica. Mult Scler 2007, 13:256-259.
- [4]Trebst C, Jarius S, Berthele A, Paul F, Schippling S, Wildemann B, Borisow N, Kleiter I, Aktas O, Kümpfel T, Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS): Update on the diagnosis and treatment of neuromyelitis optica: recommendations of the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). J Neurol 2014, 261:1-16.
- [5]Jacob A, Weinshenker BG, Violich I, McLinskey N, Krupp L, Fox RJ, Wingerchuk DM, Boggild M, Constantinescu CS, Miller A, De Angelis T, Matiello M, Cree BA: Treatment of neuromyelitis optica with rituximab: retrospective analysis of 25 patients. Arch Neurol 2008, 65:1443-1448.
- [6]Barnett MH, Prineas JW, Buckland ME, Parratt JD, Pollard JD: Massive astrocyte destruction in neuromyelitis optica despite natalizumab therapy. Mult Scler 2012, 18:108-112.
- [7]Ayzenberg I, Kleiter I, Schröder A, Hellwig K, Chan A, Yamamura T, Gold R: Interleukin 6 receptor blockade in patients with neuromyelitis optica nonresponsive to anti-CD20 therapy. JAMA Neurol 2013, 70:394-397.
- [8]Jarius S, Ruprecht K, Wildemann B, Kuempfel T, Ringelstein M, Geis C, Kleiter I, Kleinschnitz C, Berthele A, Brettschneider J, Hellwig K, Hemmer B, Linker RA, Lauda F, Mayer CA, Tumani H, Melms A, Trebst C, Stangel M, Marziniak M, Hoffmann F, Schippling S, Faiss JH, Neuhaus O, Ettrich B, Zentner C, Guthke K, Hofstadt-van Oy U, Reuss R, Pellkofer H, et al.: Contrasting disease patterns in seropositive and seronegative neuromyelitis optica: a multicentre study of 175 patients. J Neuroinflammation 2012, 19:14.
- [9]Kleiter I, Hellwig K, Berthele A, Kümpfel T, Linker RA, Hartung HP, Paul F, Aktas O, Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group: Failure of natalizumab to prevent relapses in neuromyelitis optica. Arch Neurol 2012, 69:239-245.
- [10]Jacob A, Hutchinson M, Elsone L, Kelly S, Ali R, Saukans I, Tubridy N, Boggild M: Does natalizumab therapy worsen neuromyelitis optica? Neurology 2012, 79:1065-1066.
- [11]Juryńczyk M, Zaleski K, Selmaj K: Natalizumab and the development of extensive brain lesions in neuromyelitis optica. J Neurol 2013, 260:1919-1921.
- [12]Govindarajan R, Salgado E: Is it too early to predict the failure of natalizumab in NMO? Arch Neurol 2012, 69:1085.
- [13]Kim SH, Kim W, Li XF, Jung IJ, Kim HJ: Repeated treatment with rituximab based on the assessment of peripheral circulating memory B cells in patients with relapsing neuromyelitis optica over 2 years. Arch Neurol 2011, 68:1412-1420.
- [14]Krumbholz M, Meinl I, Kümpfel T, Hohlfeld R, Meinl E: Natalizumab disproportionately increases circulating pre-B and B cells in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2008, 71:1350-1354.
- [15]Bichuetti DB, Oliveira EM, Boulos Fde C, Gabbai AA: Lack of response to pulse cyclophosphamide in neuromyelitis optica: evaluation of 7 patients. Arch Neurol 2012, 69:938-939.
- [16]Weinshenker BG, Wingerchuk DM, Vukusic S, Linbo L, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF, Lennon VA: Neuromyelitis optica IgG predicts relapse after longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis. Ann Neurol 2006, 59:566-569.