The environmental hypersensitivity symptom inventory: metric properties and normative data from a population-based study

Archives of Public Health

Steven Nordin¹  Eva Palmquist¹  Anna-Sara Claeson¹  Berndt Stenberg² 

[1] Department of Psychology, Umeå University, Umeå SE-90187, Sweden

[2] Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå 414 SE-90187, Sweden

关键词: Sick building syndrome;    Prevalence;    Idiopathic environmental intolerance;    Hyperacusis;    Electromagnetic fields;    Chemical intolerance;   

Others  :  790794
DOI  :  10.1186/0778-7367-71-18

 received in 2013-04-20, accepted in 2013-06-27,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

High concomitant intolerance attributed to odorous/pungent chemicals, certain buildings, electromagnetic fields (EMF), and everyday sounds calls for a questionnaire instrument that can assess symptom prevalence in various environmental intolerances. The Environmental Hypersensitivity Symptom Inventory (EHSI) was therefore developed and metrically evaluated, and normative data were established. The EHSI consists of 34 symptom items, requires limited time to respond to, and provides a detailed and broad description of the individual’s symptomology.

Methods

Data from 3406 individuals who took part in the Västerbotten Environmental Health Study were used. The participants constitute a random sample of inhabitants in the county of Västerbotten in Sweden, aged 18 to 79 years, stratified for age and gender.

Results

Exploratory factor analysis identified five significant factors: airway symptoms (9 items; Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 coefficient, KR-20, of internal consistency = 0.74), skin and eye symptoms (6 items; KR-20 = 0.60), cardiac, dizziness and nausea symptoms (4 items; KR-20 = 0.55), head-related and gastrointestinal symptoms (5 items; KR-20 = 0.55), and cognitive and affective symptoms (10 items; KR-20 = 0.80). The KR-20 was 0.85 for the entire 34-item EHSI. Symptom prevalence rates in percentage for having the specific symptoms every week over the preceding three months constitute normative data.

Conclusions

The EHSI can be recommended for assessment of symptom prevalence in various types of environmental hypersensitivity, and with the advantage of comparing prevalence rates with normality.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Nordin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection: Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Phys 1998, 74:494-522.
• [2]Rubin GJ, Rosa Nieto-Hernandez R, Wessely S: Idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (formerly ‘electromagnetic hypersensitivity’): an updated systematic review of provocation studies. Bioelectromagnetics 2010, 31:1-11.
• [3]Szemerszky R, Köteles F, Lihi R, Bárdos G: Polluted places or polluted minds? An experimental sham-exposure study on background psychological factors of symptom formation in ‘Idiophatic Environmental Intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields’. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2010, 213:387-394.
• [4]Witthöft M, Rubin GJ: Are media warnings about the adverse health effects of modern life self-fulfilling? An experimental study on idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF). J Psychosom Res 2013, 74:206-212.
• [5]Labarge AS, McCaffrey RJ: Multiple chemical sensitivity: a review of the theoretical and research literature. Neuropsychological Review 2010, 10:183-211.
• [6]Hodgson MJ, Addorisio MR: Exposures in indoor environments. In Textbook of Clinical Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2nd edition. Edited by Rosenstock L, Cullen MR, Brodkin CA, Redlich CA. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2005:1133-1142.
• [7]Genuis SJ, Lipp CT: Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: fact or fiction? Sci Total Environ 2012, 414:103-112.
• [8]Baguley DM: Hyperacusis. J Royal Soc Med 2003, 96:582-585.
• [9]Nordin S, Söderholm A, Palmquist E, Andersson L, Claeson A-S, Nordin M: Miljökänslighet: den osynliga folksjukdomen. Ett detektivarbete kring orsakerna till miljörelaterad överkänslighet. In Byggnadsrelaterad ohälsa i Kvarkenregionen - nio delprojekt om miljökänslighet, luftkvalitet och sjuka hus ur ett tvärvetenskapligt perspektiv hälsa. Edited by Osterberg M. Vasa: Novia produktion och publikation; 2012:30-43. Series R: Report no
• [10]Andersson MJE, Andersson L, Bende M, Millqvist E, Nordin S: The idiopathic environmental intolerance symptom inventory: development, evaluation and application. J Occup Environ Med 2009, 51:838-847.
• [11]Edvardsson B, Stenberg B, Bergdahl J, Eriksson N, Lindén G, Widman L: Medical and social prognoses of non-specific building-related symptoms (Sick Building Syndrome): a follow-up study of patients previously referred to hospital. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2008, 81:805-812.
• [12]Hillert L, Berglind N, Arnetz BB, Bellander T: Prevalence of self-reported hypersensitivity to electric or magnetic fields in a population-based questionnaire survey. Scand J Work Environ Health 2002, 28:33-41.
• [13]Andersson G, Lindvall N, Hursti T, Carlbring P: Hypersensitvity to sound (hyperacusis): a prevalence study conducted via the internet and post. Int J Audiol 2002, 41:545-54.
• [14]Bergdahl J, Stenberg B, Eriksson N, Lindén G, Widman L: Coping and self-image in patients with visual display terminal-related skin symptoms and perceived hypersensitivity to electricity. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2004, 77:538-542.
• [15]Johansson A, Nordin S, Heiden M, Sandström M: Symptoms, personality traits, and stress in people with mobile phone-related symptoms and electromagnetic hypersensitivity. J Psychosom Res 2010, 68:37-45.
• [16]Lipson JG: Multiple chemical sensitivities: stigma and social experiences. Med Anthropol 2004, 18:200-213.
• [17]Larsson C, Mårtensson L: Experiences of problems in individuals with hypersensitivity to odours and chemicals. J Clin Nurs 2009, 18:737-744.
• [18]Skovbjerg S, Brorson S, Rasmussen A, Johansen JD, Elberling J: Impact of self-reported multiple chemical sensitivity on everyday life: a qualitative study. Scand J Publ Health 2009, 37:621-626.
• [19]Gibson PR: Of the world but not in it: barriers to community access and education for persons with environmental sensitivities. Health Care Women Int 2010, 31:3-16.
• [20]Söderholm A, Söderberg A, Nordin S: The experience of living with sensory hyperreactivity: accessibility, financial security and social relationships. Health Care Women Int 2011, 32:686-707.
• [21]Shepherd D, Welch D, Dirks KN, Mathews R: Exploring the relationship between noise sensitivity, annoyance and health-related quality of life in a sample of adults exposed to environmental noise. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2010, 7:3579-3594.
• [22]Nordin M, Andersson L, Nordin S: Coping strategies, social support and responsibility in chemical intolerance. J Clin Nurs 2010, 19:2162-2173.
• [23]Stenberg B, Bergdahl J, Edvardsson B, Eriksson N, Lindén G, Widman L: Medical and social prognosis for patients with perceived hypersensitivity to electricity and skin symptoms related to the use of visual display terminals. Scand J Work Environ Health 2002, 28:349-357.
• [24]Millqvist E: Mechanisms of increased airway sensitivity to occupational chemicals and odors. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2008, 8:135-139.
• [25]Fiedler N, Kelly-McNeil K, Ohman-Strickland P, Zhang J, Ottenweller J, Kipen HM: Negative affect and chemical intolerance as risk factors for building-related symptoms: a controlled exposure study. Psychosom Med 2008, 70:254-262.
• [26]Miller CS, Prihoda TJ: The environmental exposure and sensitivity inventory (EESI): a standardized approach for measuring chemical intolerances for research and clinical applications. Toxicol Ind Health 1999, 15:370-385.
• [27]Andersson K: Epidemiological approach to indoor air problems. Indoor Air 1998, 4(Suppl):32-39.
• [28]Carlsson F, Karlsson B, Orbaek P, Österberg K, Östergren PO: Prevalance of annoyance attributed to electrical equipment and smells in a Swedish population, and relationsship with subjective health and daily function. Public Health 2005, 119:568-577.
• [29]Statistics Sweden: Tables of Sweden’s population 2009: 1.3.1 Population by sex, age, marital status by county Dec. 31, 2009 according to the administrative subdivisions of January 1, 2010. 2013. http://www.scb.se/statistik/_publikationer/BE0101_2009A01_BR_05_BE0110TAB.pdf webcite
• [30]World Health Organization (WHO): Indoor air quality and research. Euro Reports and Studies 103. Geneva: WHO; 1986.
• [31]Röösli M, Moser M, Baldinini Y, Meier M, Braun-Fahrländer C: Symptoms of ill health ascribed to electromagnetic field exposure: a questionnaire survey. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2004, 207:141-150.
• [32]World Health Organization (WHO): Electromagnetic fields and public health. Fact sheet No 296. Geneva: WHO Media Centre; 2005.
• [33]Schwarz N: Self-reports: how the questions shape the answers. Am Psychol 1999, 54:93-105.
• [34]Eriksson NM, Stenberg BGT: Baseline prevalence of symptoms related to indoor environment. Scand J Publ Health 2006, 34:387-396.
• [35]Cattell RB: The scree test for the number of factors. Multivar Behav Res 1966, 1:245-276.
• [36]Höfler M, Pfister H, Lieb R, Wittchen H-U: The use of weights to account for non-response and drop-out. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2004, 40:291-299.
• [37]Miller C, Mitzel HC: Chemical sensitivity attributed to pesticide exposure versus remodeling. Arch Environ Health 1995, 50:119-129.
• [38]Anastasia A: Psychological testing. New York: Macmillan; 1988.
• [39]Proposition 2007/08:44: Vissa etikprövningsfrågor m.m. http://www.regeringen.se/content/1/c6/09/48/06/b497e80c.pdf webcite
• [40]Groves RM, Couper MP, Presser S, Singer E, Tourangeau R, Acosta GP, Nelson L: Experiments in producing nonresponse bias. Publ Opin Quart 2006, 70:720-736.
• [41]Andersson K, Norlén U: Indoor climate and health effects: The indoor climate in the Swedish housing stock. In Indoor air quality in practice: moisture and cold climate solutions. Edited by Flatheim G, Berg K, Edvardsen K. Oslo: Norwegian Society of Chartered Engineers; 1995:23-28.
• [42]Gijsbergs van Wijk CMT, Kolk AM: Sex differences in physical symptoms: the contribution of symptom perception theory. Soc Sci Med 1977, 45:231-246.
• [43]Nordin S, Lidén E, Gidlöf-Gunnarsson A: Development and evaluation of a category ratio scale with semantic descriptors: the environmental annoyance scale. Scand J Psychol 2009, 50:93-100.