ironically, his government got more ownership afterward giving up the ownership. Even, after gaining trust from recipient, his regime had aid negotiation power. In this point, I focus the power relation between donor and recipient. The notion of ownership is not a carte blanch for developing countries to draw up their development path, but rather a relative independence in the extent to which they may comply with international organizations and donors’ strategic framework and requirements for aid disbursement. Although a lot of papers imply that most donor-driven policy is evaluated as inefficient one, and has a detrimental effect on ownership although it has a good intention, but there is a paradox and complexity in ownership in terms of outcome of success empirically. The correlation between the ownership of recipient countries and success of aid program in real appears to be unforeseeable result. In this vein, the discussion about true ownership is needed.
【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files
Size
Format
View
Bringing Capacity Building Back in Aid Ownership : An Analysis of Aid Relations between U.S and South Korea in the 1950s and 1960s.