| Compressor Calorimeter Test of R-410A Alternatives R-32, DR-5, and L-41a | |
| Shrestha, Som S1  Mahderekal, Isaac1  Sharma, Vishaldeep1  Abdelaziz, Omar1  | |
| [1] ORNL | |
| 关键词: Alternative Refrigerants; Low GWP; Compressor; Calorimeter; Heat Pump; | |
| DOI : 10.2172/1089800 RP-ID : ORNL/TM-2013/292 PID : OSTI ID: 1089800 Others : Other: BT0101000 Others : BT0201000 Others : BT0400000 Others : CEBT002 |
|
| 美国|英语 | |
| 来源: SciTech Connect | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
As a contribution to the AHRI Low-GWP Alternative Refrigerants Evaluation Program (AREP), this study compares performance of alternative refrigerants R32, DR-5, and L-41A to that of refrigerant R-410A (baseline) in a scroll compressor designed for air-conditioning and heat pump applications. Compressor calorimeter tests were performed to evaluate the performance of the lower-GWP alternative refrigerants in place of the common refrigerant R-410A in a 36,000 Btu/hr compressor calorimeter using a compressor having a nominal rated capacity of 21,300 Btu/hr. Tests were conducted over a suction dew point temperature range of 10 F to 55 F in 5 F increments and a discharge dew point temperature range of 70 F to 140 F in 10 F increments. All the tests were performed with 20 F superheat, 40 F superheat and 65 F suction temperature. A liquid subcooling level of 15 F was maintained for all the test conditions. The tests showed that performance of these three lower-GWP alternative refrigerants is comparable to that of R-410A. For the 20 F superheat and 15 F subcooling test conditions, EERs of R32, DR-5, and L-41A were 90% to 99%, 96% to 99%, and 94% to 101%, respectively, compared to that of R-410A. Similarly, cooling capacities of R32, DR-5, and L-41A were 98% to 103%, 92% to 96%, and 84% to 92%, respectively, compared to that of R-410A.
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| RO201704180004345LZ | 1125KB |
PDF