期刊论文详细信息
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY 卷:42
Registry of implants for the reconstruction of pelvic floor in males and females: A feasibility case series
Article
Barski, Dimitri1  Gerullis, Holger2  Ecke, Thorsten3  Kranz, Jennifer4  Schneidewind, Laila5  Leistner, Nadine6  Queissert, Fabian7  Muehlstaedt, Sandra8  Grabbert, Markus9  Tahbaz, Rana10  Pelzer, Alexandre Egon11  Joukhadar, Ralf12  Klinge, Uwe13  Boros, Mihaly14  Bader, Werner15  Naumann, Gert16  Puppe, Frank17  Otto, Thomas18 
[1] Lukas Hosp Neuss, Dept Urol, Preussenstr 84, D-41464 Neuss, Germany
[2] Carl von Ossietzky Univ Oldenburg, Univ Hosp Urol, Klinikum Oldenburg, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Oldenburg, Germany
[3] Helios Hosp, Dept Urol, Bad Saarow Pieskow, Germany
[4] St Antonius Hosp Eschweiler, Dept Urol, Eschweiler, Germany
[5] Univ Saarland, Med Ctr, Inst Virol, Homburg, Saar, Germany
[6] Univ Hosp Bonn, Dept Neurourol, Bonn, Germany
[7] Univ Hosp Munster, Dept Urol, Munster, Germany
[8] Univ Hosp Halle Saale, Dept Urol, Halle, Germany
[9] Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Urol, Cologne, Germany
[10] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Urol, Hamburg, Germany
[11] Klinikum Wels Grieskirchen, Dept Urol, Wels, Austria
[12] Univ Hosp, Dept Gynecol, Wurzburg, Germany
[13] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Univ Hosp, Surg Dept, Aachen, Germany
[14] Univ Szeged, Inst Expt Surg, Szeged, Hungary
[15] Klinikum Bielefeld, Dept Gynecol, Bielefeld, Germany
[16] HELIOS Hosp, Dept Gynecol, Erfurt, Germany
[17] Univ Wurzburg, Inst Math & Comp Sci, Wurzburg, Germany
[18] Lukas Hosp, Dept Urol, Neuss, Germany
关键词: IDEAL;    Implant;    Incontinence;    Mesh;    Pelvic floor;    Prolapse;    Registry;   
DOI  :  10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.04.028
来源: Elsevier
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Introduction: Most aspects of implant-assisted reconstruction of pelvic floor in males and females are under debate and the research is not standardized. Registries are supposed to shed light to the indications, surgical techniques and material properties and to establish a standardized evaluation. Methods: A working group was formed to create an online platform for registration and outcome measurement of implant-assisted operations for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and female and male stress urinary incontinence (SUI). 20 patients with modified mesh materials were evaluated over 23 months 'follow up in the registry to prove the feasibility of the registry. For validation a previously published modified satisfaction, anatomy, continence, safety - S.(A.)C.S score was used. Results: A consensus was met on definitions and classifications of patient variables, surgical procedures and implants, as well as outcome parameters (efficacy, continence, satisfaction, complications). Different subgroup modules were formed in accordance with treated condition. The maximum score of cure was reached by 25-100% of patients depending on the indication. Conclusion: A prospective registry in accordance with IDEAL-D framework is justified for the evaluation and regulation of implants for pelvic floor reconstruction. (C) 2017 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

【 授权许可】

Free   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
10_1016_j_ijsu_2017_04_028.pdf 710KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:1次 浏览次数:0次