PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH | 卷:245 |
Do gender and directness of trauma exposure moderate PTSD's latent structure? | |
Article | |
Frankfurt, Sheila B.1  Armour, Cherie2  Contractor, Ateka A.3,6,7,8  Elhai, Jon D.4,5  | |
[1] Doris Miller VA Med Ctr, Dept Vet Affairs, VISN Ctr Excellence Res Returning War Vet 17, Waco, TX 76711 USA | |
[2] Univ Ulster, Psychol Res Inst, Coleraine, Londonderry, North Ireland | |
[3] Univ North Texas, Dept Psychol, Denton, TX USA | |
[4] Univ Toledo, Dept Psychol, Toledo, OH 43606 USA | |
[5] Univ Toledo, Dept Psychiat, 2801 W Bancroft St, Toledo, OH 43606 USA | |
[6] Univ North Texas, Denton, TX USA | |
[7] VA Boston Healthcare Syst, Massachusetts Vet Epidemiol Res & Informat Ctr MA, Boston, MA USA | |
[8] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Boston, MA 02215 USA | |
关键词: Posttraumatic stress disorder; Measurement invariance; Factor structure; Gender; Directness of trauma; PCL-5; | |
DOI : 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.08.049 | |
来源: Elsevier | |
【 摘 要 】
The PTSD diagnosis and latent structure were substantially revised in the transition from DSM-IV to DSM-5. However, three alternative models (i.e., anhedonia model, externalizing behavior model, and hybrid model) of PTSD fit the DSM-5 symptom criteria better than the DSM-5 factor model. Thus, the psychometric performance of the DSM-5 and alternative models' PTSD factor structure needs to be critically evaluated. The current study examined whether gender or trauma directness (i.e., direct or indirect trauma exposure) moderates the PTSD latent structure when using the DSM-5 or alternative models. Model performance was evaluated with measurement invariance testing procedures on a large undergraduate sample (n=455). Gender and trauma directness moderated the DSM-5 PTSD and externalizing behavior model and did not moderate the anhedonia and hybrid models' latent structure. Clinical implications and directions for future research are discussed. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
【 授权许可】
Free
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
10_1016_j_psychres_2016_08_049.pdf | 717KB | download |