期刊论文详细信息
Lipids in Health and Disease
Lipidomic risk score independently and cost-effectively predicts risk of future type 2 diabetes: results from diverse cohorts
Research
Dianna J. Magliano1  Peter J. Meikle1  Gerard Wong1  Jonathan Shaw1  Paul Zimmet1  Jacquelyn M. Weir1  Christopher K. Barlow1  Anthony G. Comuzzie2  David C. Glahn3  Thomas D. Dyer4  Michael C. Mahaney4  John Blangero4  Sarah Williams-Blangero4  Ravindranath Duggirala4  Laura Almasy4  Hemant Kulkarni4  Joanne E. Curran4  Manju Mamtani4 
[1] Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia;Department of Genetics, Texas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, TX, USA;Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA;Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Institute of Living, Hartford Hospital, 200 Retreat Avenue, New Haven, CT, USA;South Texas Diabetes and Obesity Institute, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley School of Medicine, 78520, Brownsville, TX, USA;
关键词: Diabetes;    Endocrine disorders;    Lipidomics;    Diagnostic tools;    Genetics;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12944-016-0234-3
 received in 2016-01-08, accepted in 2016-03-24,  发布年份 2016
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundDetection of type 2 diabetes (T2D) is routinely based on the presence of dysglycemia. Although disturbed lipid metabolism is a hallmark of T2D, the potential of plasma lipidomics as a biomarker of future T2D is unknown. Our objective was to develop and validate a plasma lipidomic risk score (LRS) as a biomarker of future type 2 diabetes and to evaluate its cost-effectiveness for T2D screening.MethodsPlasma LRS, based on significantly associated lipid species from an array of 319 lipid species, was developed in a cohort of initially T2D-free individuals from the San Antonio Family Heart Study (SAFHS). The LRS derived from SAFHS as well as its recalibrated version were validated in an independent cohort from Australia – the AusDiab cohort. The participants were T2D-free at baseline and followed for 9197 person-years in the SAFHS cohort (n = 771) and 5930 person-years in the AusDiab cohort (n = 644). Statistically and clinically improved T2D prediction was evaluated with established statistical parameters in both cohorts. Modeling studies were conducted to determine whether the use of LRS would be cost-effective for T2D screening. The main outcome measures included accuracy and incremental value of the LRS over routinely used clinical predictors of T2D risk; validation of these results in an independent cohort and cost-effectiveness of including LRS in screening/intervention programs for T2D.ResultsThe LRS was based on plasma concentration of dihydroceramide 18:0, lysoalkylphosphatidylcholine 22:1 and triacyglycerol 16:0/18:0/18:1. The score predicted future T2D independently of prediabetes with an accuracy of 76 %. Even in the subset of initially euglycemic individuals, the LRS improved T2D prediction. In the AusDiab cohort, the LRS continued to predict T2D significantly and independently. When combined with risk-stratification methods currently used in clinical practice, the LRS significantly improved the model fit (p < 0.001), information content (p < 0.001), discrimination (p < 0.001) and reclassification (p < 0.001) in both cohorts. Modeling studies demonstrated that LRS-based risk-stratification combined with metformin supplementation for high-risk individuals was the most cost-effective strategy for T2D prevention.ConclusionsConsidering the novelty, incremental value and cost-effectiveness of LRS it should be used for risk-stratification of future T2D.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Mamtani et al. 2016

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311106620387ZK.pdf 1260KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  • [60]
  • [61]
  • [62]
  • [63]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:7次 浏览次数:5次