期刊论文详细信息
Human Resources for Health
Examining the influence of country-level and health system factors on nursing and physician personnel production
Research
Hiram Beltrán-Sánchez1  S. Jennifer Uyei2  Simon A. Jones3  Allison Squires4 
[1] Department of Community Health Sciences, California Center for Population Research, University of California, Los Angeles, 650 Charles E. Young Drive South, Room 41-257 CHS, 53706-1393, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America;Division of Comparative Effectiveness and Decision Science, New York University School of Medicine, 227 East 30th Street, 10016, New York, NY, United States of America;Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, 227 East 30th Street, 10016, New York, NY, United States of America;Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, 433 First Avenue, 10010, New York, NY, United States of America;Research on Medical Education Outcomes (ROMEO) Division, School of Medicine, New York University, 433 First Avenue, 10010, New York, NY, United States of America;
关键词: Human resources for health;    Socioeconomic development;    Policy;    Global health;    Complexity theory;    Nurse-to-population ratio;    Physician-to-population ratio;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12960-016-0145-4
 received in 2015-02-23, accepted in 2016-07-28,  发布年份 2016
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundA key component to achieving good patient outcomes is having the right type and number of healthcare professionals with the right resources. Lack of investment in infrastructure required for producing and retaining adequate numbers of health professionals is one reason, and contextual factors related to socioeconomic development may further explain the trend. Therefore, this study sought to explore the relationships between country-level contextual factors and healthcare human resource production (defined as worker-to-population ratio) across 184 countries.MethodsThis exploratory observational study is grounded in complexity theory as a guiding framework. Variables were selected through a process that attempted to choose macro-level indicators identified by the interdisciplinary literature as known or likely to affect the number of healthcare workers in a country. The combination of these variables attempts to account for the gender- and class-sensitive identities of physicians and nurses. The analysis consisted of 1 year of publicly available data, using the most recently available year for each country where multiple regressions assessed how context may influence health worker production. Missing data were imputed using the ICE technique in STATA and the analyses rerun in R as an additional validity and rigor check.ResultsThe models explained 63 % of the nurse/midwife-to-population ratio (pseudo R2 = 0.627, p = 0.0000) and 73 % of the physician-to-population ratio (pseudo R2 = 0.729, p = 0.0000). Average years of school in a country’s population, emigration rates, beds-per-1000 population, and low-income country statuses were consistently statistically significant predictors of production, with percentage of public and private sector financing of healthcare showing mixed effects.ConclusionsOur study demonstrates that the strength of political, social, and economic institutions does impact human resources for health production and lays a foundation for studying how macro-level contextual factors influence physician and nurse workforce supply. In particular, the results suggest that public and private investments in the education sector would provide the greatest rate of return to countries. The study offers a foundation from which longitudinal analyses can be conducted and identifies additional data that may help enhance the robustness of the models.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Squires et al. 2016

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311104203627ZK.pdf 1126KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:12次 浏览次数:1次