期刊论文详细信息
Sports Medicine - Open
Effects of Upper-Body Plyometric Training on Physical Fitness in Healthy Youth and Young Adult Participants: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Urs Granacher1  Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo2  José Afonso3  Exal Garcia-Carrillo4  Mikel Izquierdo5  Rohit K. Thapa6 
[1] Department of Sport and Sport Science, Exercise and Human Movement Science, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany;Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, School of Physical Therapy, Universidad Andres Bello, 7591538, Santiago, Chile;Faculty of Sport, Centre of Research, Education, Innovation, and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D), University of Porto, 4200-450, Porto, Portugal;Navarrabiomed-Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra (CHN), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), 31008, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain;Navarrabiomed-Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra (CHN), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), 31008, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain;Department of Health Sciences, Public University of Navarra, Av. De Barañain s/n, 31008, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain;Symbiosis School of Sports Sciences, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), 412115, Pune, India;
关键词: Plyometric exercise;    Muscle strength;    Musculoskeletal physiological phenomena;    Human physical conditioning;    Resistance training;    Athletic performance;    Sports medicine;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s40798-023-00631-2
 received in 2023-04-25, accepted in 2023-08-19,  发布年份 2023
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundUpper-body plyometric training (UBPT) is a commonly used training method, yet its effects on physical fitness are inconsistent and there is a lack of comprehensive reviews on the topic.ObjectiveTo examine the effects of UBPT on physical fitness in healthy youth and young adult participants compared to active, specific-active, and passive controls.MethodsThis systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines and utilized the PICOS framework. PubMed, WOS, and SCOPUS were searched. Studies were assessed for eligibility using the PICOS framework. The effects of UBPT on upper-body physical fitness were assessed, including maximal strength, medicine ball throw performance, sport-specific throwing performance, and upper limb muscle volume. The risk of bias was evaluated using the PEDro scale. Means and standard deviations were used to calculate effect sizes, and the I2 statistic was used to assess heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed using the extended Egger's test. Certainty of evidence was rated using the GRADE scale. Additional analyses included sensitivity analyses and adverse effects.ResultsThirty-five studies were included in the systematic review and 30 studies in meta-analyses, involving 1412 male and female participants from various sport-fitness backgrounds. Training duration ranged from 4 to 16 weeks. Compared to controls, UBPT improved maximal strength (small ES = 0.39 95% CI = 0.15–0.63, p = 0.002, I2 = 29.7%), medicine ball throw performance (moderate ES = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.43–0.85, p < 0.001, I2 = 46.3%), sport-specific throwing performance (small ES = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.25–0.86, p < 0.001, I2 = 36.8%), and upper limbs muscle volume (moderate ES = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.20–1.08, p = 0.005, I2 = 0.0%). The GRADE analyses provided low or very low certainty for the recommendation of UBPT for improving physical fitness in healthy participants. One study reported one participant with an injury due to UBPT. The other 34 included studies provided no report measure for adverse effects linked to UBPT.ConclusionsUBPT interventions may enhance physical fitness in healthy youth and young adult individuals compared to control conditions. However, the certainty of evidence for these recommendations is low or very low. Further research is needed to establish the optimal dose of UBPT and to determine its effect on female participants and its transfer to other upper-body dominated sports.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311103713456ZK.pdf 1461KB PDF download
Fig. 1 245KB Image download
Fig. 2 155KB Image download
12951_2017_255_Article_IEq52.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 1 384KB Image download
Fig. 6 1548KB Image download
12951_2016_246_Article_IEq16.gif 1KB Image download
【 图 表 】

12951_2016_246_Article_IEq16.gif

Fig. 6

Fig. 1

12951_2017_255_Article_IEq52.gif

Fig. 2

Fig. 1

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  • [60]
  • [61]
  • [62]
  • [63]
  • [64]
  • [65]
  • [66]
  • [67]
  • [68]
  • [69]
  • [70]
  • [71]
  • [72]
  • [73]
  • [74]
  • [75]
  • [76]
  • [77]
  • [78]
  • [79]
  • [80]
  • [81]
  • [82]
  • [83]
  • [84]
  • [85]
  • [86]
  • [87]
  • [88]
  • [89]
  • [90]
  • [91]
  • [92]
  • [93]
  • [94]
  • [95]
  • [96]
  • [97]
  • [98]
  • [99]
  • [100]
  • [101]
  • [102]
  • [103]
  • [104]
  • [105]
  • [106]
  • [107]
  • [108]
  • [109]
  • [110]
  • [111]
  • [112]
  • [113]
  • [114]
  • [115]
  • [116]
  • [117]
  • [118]
  • [119]
  • [120]
  • [121]
  • [122]
  • [123]
  • [124]
  • [125]
  • [126]
  • [127]
  • [128]
  • [129]
  • [130]
  • [131]
  • [132]
  • [133]
  • [134]
  • [135]
  • [136]
  • [137]
  • [138]
  • [139]
  • [140]
  • [141]
  • [142]
  • [143]
  • [144]
  • [145]
  • [146]
  • [147]
  • [148]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:42次 浏览次数:1次