期刊论文详细信息
Agriculture & Food Security
Sustainability of community-based workers in multisectoral food security programs: a case study of producer leaders, village vaccinators, mother leaders, and community health workers in Burkina Faso
Research
K. R. Wilson1  B. L. Rogers2  A. Ezaki2  D. A. Carroll2  J. Coates2 
[1] Center for Regenerative Agriculture, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA;Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA;Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA;
关键词: Food security;    Community development;    Community-based workers (CBWs);    Agricultural development;    Sustainability;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s40066-023-00432-6
 received in 2023-03-20, accepted in 2023-07-01,  发布年份 2023
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

The community-based worker (CBW) model is commonly used by food security projects as an approach to catalyze community-driven development and to enhance long-term sustainability of project impacts in rural areas of low-income countries. However, there is limited follow-up research exploring how CBWs continue to carry out expected activities in the years that follow project exit. This case study examines how four different CBW roles—producer leaders, village vaccinators, community healthcare workers, mother leaders—all trained to contribute to the food security goals of a multi-year initiative in Kaya, Burkina Faso, sustained their respective activities post-project. Two years after the project ended, we collected qualitative data to examine how well these CBWs continued providing the activities that they had been trained to provide as expected by the project. We employ a conceptual framework of sustainability and exit strategies to assess what factors contributed to sustained activities and, where activities ceased, what caused them to stop. We find that where activities were sustained, all four hypothesized factors—sustained capacities, resources, motivation, and linkages—were present. We conclude by discussing key lessons and considerations for using the CBW model: (1) gradually transition to independent operation during project lifetime; (2) integrate CBWs into permanent and functional systems through gradual project exit; (3) professionalize the CBW role (re-think the volunteer approach); (4) what to do about resources and (5) co-develop endogenous definitions and indicators from the project onset.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311102063864ZK.pdf 2590KB PDF download
MediaObjects/41408_2023_927_MOESM3_ESM.tif 2072KB Other download
Fig. 17 99KB Image download
Fig. 3 257KB Image download
12951_2015_155_Article_IEq70.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 2 522KB Image download
Fig. 1 1209KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

12951_2015_155_Article_IEq70.gif

Fig. 3

Fig. 17

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:26次 浏览次数:7次