期刊论文详细信息
BMC Nursing
Baccalaureate nursing education institutions’ key performance indicators: a review of the existing indicators and qualitative analysis of expert interviews
Research
Ali Janati1  Vahid Zamanzadeh2  Akram Ghahramanian3  Marjan Ghofrani4  Leila Valizadeh4  Fariba Taleghani5 
[1] Department of Health Service Management, Faculty of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran;Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran;Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran;Department of Pediatric Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, South Shariati Street, Tabriz, Iran;Nursing & Midwifery Care Research Center, Faculty of Nursing & Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran;
关键词: Education;    Nursing;    Baccalaureate;    Quality Improvement;    Key performance indicators;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12912-023-01484-6
 received in 2022-12-20, accepted in 2023-09-05,  发布年份 2023
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundImprovements in nurses’ and midwives’ education will increase workforce quantity and quality. Continual improvement of organization performance is based on continual measuring; Appropriate indicators must be selected to measure and appraise the performances. This study aimed to recognize and categorize key performance indicators (KPIs) for baccalaureate nursing education institutions’ performance measurement.MethodsThis study had two phases: (1) Interview: Seven semi-structured interviews were conducted with faculty members and nurses. (2) Narrative Literature review: schools’ and universities’ reports and web pages were assessed to recognize KPIs. The data analysis method was directed content analysis. The Donabedian Model components were used to guide the data analysis.ResultsThe total number of indicators retrieved was 468; 75 were from interviews with faculty members and nurses and 393 were from the literature review. Indicators were categorized into: Structure (staff; equipment, resources, and facilities; guidelines), Process (education; communication and collaboration; evaluation), and Outcome (survey and accreditation; national and international recognition; satisfaction; sustainability and financial efficiency; students; alumni; knowledge related to the field).ConclusionsA number of indicators were identified that were categorized into various groups related to the performance of nursing schools. Further investigations are needed with different groups of stakeholders including students, professional associations, healthcare institutions, alumni, and clients. As well in some areas, new or composite indicators may need to be developed. Also, each institution needs to select appropriate indicators based on its context, policy goals, and infrastructure.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311100172284ZK.pdf 1395KB PDF download
Fig. 7 466KB Image download
MediaObjects/12951_2023_2157_MOESM1_ESM.docx 3379KB Other download
12951_2016_171_Article_IEq5.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 2 939KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 2

12951_2016_171_Article_IEq5.gif

Fig. 7

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:1次 浏览次数:0次