Metacarpal bone loss in patients with rheumatoid arthritis estimated by a new Digital X-ray Radiogrammetry method – initial results

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Research Article

Peter Oelzner¹  Alexander Pfeil¹  Lisa Reinhardt¹  Gunter Wolf¹  Diane M. Renz²  Joachim Böttcher³  Hans Henrik Thodberg⁴ 

[1] Department of Internal Medicine III, Jena University Hospital – Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747, Jena, Germany;Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Jena University Hospital – Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747, Jena, Germany;Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera, Straße des Friedens 122, 07548, Gera, Germany;Visiana, Søllerødvej 57 C, DK-2840, Holte, Denmark;

关键词: BoneXpert;    Digital X-ray Radiogrammetry;    Bone mineral density;    Rheumatoid arthritis;    Cortical bone loss;    Osteoporosis;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12891-016-1348-5

 received in 2016-08-09, accepted in 2016-11-21,  发布年份 2017

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThe Digital X-ray Radiogrammetry (DXR) method measures the cortical bone thickness in the shafts of the metacarpals and has demonstrated its relevance in the assessment of hand bone loss caused by rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to validate a novel approach of the DXR method in comparison with the original version considering patients with RA.MethodThe study includes 49 patients with verified RA. The new version is an extension of the BoneXpert method commonly used in pediatrics which has these characteristics: (1) It introduces a new technique to analyze the images which automatically validates the results for most images, and (2) it defines the measurement region relative to the ends of the metacarpals. The BoneXpert method measures the Metacarpal Index (MCI) at the metacarpal bone (II to IV). Additionally, the MCI is quantified by the DXR X-posure System.ResultsThe new version correctly analyzed all 49 images, and 45 were automatically validated. The standard deviation between the MCI results of the two versions was 2.9% of the mean MCI. The average Larsen score was 2.6 with a standard deviation of 1.3. The correlation of MCI to Larsen score was −0.81 in both versions, and there was no significant difference in their ability to detect erosions.ConclusionThe new DXR version (BoneXpert) validated 92% of the cases automatically, while the same good correlation to RA severity could be presented compared to the old version.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2016