Promoting walking among office employees ― evaluation of a randomized controlled intervention with pedometers and e-mail messages

BMC Public Health

Research Article

Minna Aittasalo¹  Matti Pasanen¹  Katriina Kukkonen-Harjula¹  Marjo Rinne¹  Tommi Vasankari² 

[1] The UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, P.O. Box 30, FI-33501, Tampere, Finland;The UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, P.O. Box 30, FI-33501, Tampere, Finland;National Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, FI-00271, Helsinki, Finland;

关键词: Physical activity;    Health promotion;    pedometer;    intervention;    worksite;    evaluation;    RE-AIM;   

DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-12-403

 received in 2011-12-05, accepted in 2012-06-06,  发布年份 2012

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThe purpose of the study was to evaluate a 6-month intervention to promote office-employees’ walking with pedometers and e-mail messages.MethodsParticipants were recruited by 10 occupational health care units (OHC) from 20 worksites with 2,230 employees. Voluntary and insufficiently physically active employees (N = 241) were randomized to a pedometer (STEP, N = 123) and a comparison group (COMP, N = 118). STEP included one group meeting, log-monitored pedometer-use and six e-mail messages from OHC. COMP participated in data collection. Reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance (RE-AIM) and costs were assessed with questionnaires (0, 2, 6, 12 months), process evaluation and interviews (12 months).ResultsThe intervention reached 29% (N = 646) of employees in terms of participation willingness. Logistic regression showed that the proportion of walkers tended to increase more in STEP than in COMP at 2 months in “walking for transportation” (Odds ratio 2.12, 95%CI 0.94 to 4.81) and at 6 months in “walking for leisure” (1.86, 95%CI 0.94 to 3.69). Linear model revealed a modest increase in the mean duration of “walking stairs” at 2 and 6 months (Geometric mean ratio 1.26, 95%CI 0.98 to 1.61; 1.27, 0.98 to 1.64). Adoption and implementation succeeded as intended. At 12 months, some traces of the intervention were sustained in 15 worksites, and a slightly higher number of walkers in STEP in comparison with COMP was observed in “walking stairs” (OR 2.24, 95%CI 0.94 to 5.31) and in “walking for leisure” (2.07, 95%CI 0.99 to 4.34). The direct costs of the intervention were 43 Euros per participant.ConclusionsThe findings indicate only modest impact on some indicators of walking. Future studies should invest in reaching the employees, minimizing attrition rate and using objective walking assessment.Trial registerationISRCTN79432107

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Aittasalo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012