Promoting walking among office employees ― evaluation of a randomized controlled intervention with pedometers and e-mail messages

BMC Public Health

Tommi Vasankari¹  Katriina Kukkonen-Harjula²  Matti Pasanen²  Marjo Rinne²  Minna Aittasalo² 

[1] National Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, FI-00271, Helsinki, Finland;The UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, P.O. Box 30, FI-33501, Tampere, Finland

关键词: RE-AIM;    evaluation;    worksite;    intervention;    pedometer;    Health promotion;    Physical activity;   

Others  :  1163572
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-12-403

 received in 2011-12-05, accepted in 2012-06-06,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

The purpose of the study was to evaluate a 6-month intervention to promote office-employees’ walking with pedometers and e-mail messages.

Methods

Participants were recruited by 10 occupational health care units (OHC) from 20 worksites with 2,230 employees. Voluntary and insufficiently physically active employees (N = 241) were randomized to a pedometer (STEP, N = 123) and a comparison group (COMP, N = 118). STEP included one group meeting, log-monitored pedometer-use and six e-mail messages from OHC. COMP participated in data collection. Reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance (RE-AIM) and costs were assessed with questionnaires (0, 2, 6, 12 months), process evaluation and interviews (12 months).

Results

The intervention reached 29% (N = 646) of employees in terms of participation willingness. Logistic regression showed that the proportion of walkers tended to increase more in STEP than in COMP at 2 months in “walking for transportation” (Odds ratio 2.12, 95%CI 0.94 to 4.81) and at 6 months in “walking for leisure” (1.86, 95%CI 0.94 to 3.69). Linear model revealed a modest increase in the mean duration of “walking stairs” at 2 and 6 months (Geometric mean ratio 1.26, 95%CI 0.98 to 1.61; 1.27, 0.98 to 1.64). Adoption and implementation succeeded as intended. At 12 months, some traces of the intervention were sustained in 15 worksites, and a slightly higher number of walkers in STEP in comparison with COMP was observed in “walking stairs” (OR 2.24, 95%CI 0.94 to 5.31) and in “walking for leisure” (2.07, 95%CI 0.99 to 4.34). The direct costs of the intervention were 43 Euros per participant.

Conclusions

The findings indicate only modest impact on some indicators of walking. Future studies should invest in reaching the employees, minimizing attrition rate and using objective walking assessment.

Trial registeration

ISRCTN79432107

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Aittasalo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1 .

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee: Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report, 2008. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC; 2008. www.health.gov/paguidelines/Report/pdf/CommitteeReport.pdf webcite
• [2]Helakorpi S, Pajunen T, Jallinoja P, Virtanen S, Uutela A: Health behaviour and health among the Finnish adult population. Spring 2009. National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki; 2010. Report 7/2010, 211 pages. http://www.thl.fi/thl-client/pdfs/ce5ee5c1-6df4-44c2-bcd7-c3b735019570 webcite
• [3]Pelletier B, Boles M, Lynch W: Change in health risks and work productivity over time. J Occup Environ Med 2004, 46:746-754.
• [4]Grosch JW, Alterman T, Petersen MR, Murphy LR: Worksite health promotion programs in the U.S.: factors associated with availability and participation. Am J Health Promot 1998, 13:36-45.
• [5]Marshall AL: Challenges and opportunities for promoting physical activity in workplace. J Sci Med Sport 2004, 7:60-66.
• [6]Lee I-M, Buchner DM: The importance of walking to public health. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008, 40:S512-S518.
• [7]Crouter SE, Schneider PL, Karabulut M, Bassett DR: Validity of 10 electronic pedometers for measuring steps, distance and energy cost. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003, 35:1455-1460.
• [8]Tones K, Green J: Health Promotion. Planning and Strategies. Sage Publications Ltd, London; 2004:p 103-p 104.
• [9]Van Achterberg T, Huisman-De Waal GGJ, Ketelaar NABM, Oostendorp RA, Jacobs JE, Wollersheim HCH: How to promote healthy behaviours in patients? An overview of evidence for behaviour change techniques. Health Prom Int 2010, 26:148-162.
• [10]Bravata DM, Smith-Spangler C, Sundaram V, Gienger AL, Lin N, Lewis R, Stave CD, Olkin I, Sirard JR: Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health. JAMA 2007, 298:2296-2304.
• [11]NICE: A rapid review of the effectiness of pedometer interventions to promote physical activity in adults. January. 2006. www.nice.org.uk webcite
• [12]Ogilvie D, Foster C, Rothnie H, Cavill N, Hamilton V, Fitzsimons CF, Scottish Physical Activity Research Collaboration (SPARColl), Scottish Physical Activity Research Collaboration (SPARColl): Interventions to promote walking: systematic review. BMJ 2007, 334:1204-1207.
• [13]Bjørk Petersen C, Severin M, Wolff Hansen A, Curtis T, Grønbæk M, Schurmann Tolstrup J: A population-based randomized controlled trail of the effect of combining a pedometer with an intervention toolkit on physical activity among individuals with low levels of physical activity or fitness. Prev Med 2012, 54:125-130.
• [14]Eastep E, Beveridge S, Eisenman P, Ransdell L, Shutz B: Does augmented feedback from pedometers increase adults’ walking behavior? Percept Mot Skills 2004, 99:392-402.
• [15]Wyatt HR, Peters JC, Reed GW, Grunwald GK, Barry M, Thompson H, Jones J, Hill JO: Using electronic step counters to increase lifestyle physical activity: Colorado on the Move. J Phys Act Health 2004, 1:181-190.
• [16]Chan CB, Ryan DAJ, Tudor-Locke C: Health benefits of a pedometer-based physical activity intervention in sedentary workers. Prev Med 2004, 39:1215-1222.
• [17]Croteau KA: A preliminary study on the impact of a pedometer-based intervention on daily steps. Am J Health Promot 2004, 18:217-220.
• [18]Thomas L, Williams M: Promoting physical activity in the workplace: using pedometers to increase daily activity levels. Health Prom J Austr 2006, 17:97-102.
• [19]Dinger MK, Heesch KC, Cipriani G, Qualls M: Comparison of two email-delivered, pedometer-based interventions to promote walking among insufficiently active women. J Sci Med Sport 2007, 10:297-302.
• [20]Faghri PD, Omokaro C, Parker C, Nichols E, Gustavesen S, Blozie E: E-technology and pedometer walking program to increase physical activity at work. J Primary Prevent 2008, 29:73-91.
• [21]Gilson ND, Puig-Ribera A, Mckenna J, Brown WJ, Burton NW, Cooke CB: Do walking strategies to increase physical activity reduce reported sitting in workplaces: A randomized control trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2009, 6:43. BioMed Central Full Text
• [22]Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM: Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health 1999, 89:1322-1327.
• [23]Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Eskelinen L, Järvinen E, Toikkanen J, Klockars M: Prevalence and incidence rates of diseases and work ability in different work categories of municipal occupations. Scand J Work Environ Health 1991, 17:S67-S74.
• [24]Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, Bauman A, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P: International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003, 35:1381-1395.
• [25]Tudor-Locke C, Burkett L, Reis JP, Ainsworth BE, Macera CA, Wilson DK: How many steps of pedometer monitoring predict weekly physical activity in adults? Prev Med 2005, 40:293-298.
• [26]Tudor-Locke C: Taking steps toward increased physical activity: using pedometers to measure and motivate. Res Dig 2002, 17:1-8.
• [27]Lippke S, Ziegelmann JP, Schwarzer R: Initiation and maintenance of physical exercise: stage-specific effects of a planning intervention. Res Sports Med 2004, 12:221-240.
• [28]Schwarzer R: Modeling health behavior change: how to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Appl Psych 2008, 57:1-29.
• [29]Schwarzer R, Lippke S, Ziegelmann JP: Health action process approach. A research agenda at Freie Universität Berlin to examine and promote health behavior change. Z Gesundh 2008, 16:157-160.
• [30]Welk GJ, Differding JA, Thompson RW, Blair SN, Dziura J, Hart P: The utility of the digi-walker step counter to assess daily physical activity patterns. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000, 32:S481-S488.
• [31]Eakin EG, Smith BJ, Bauman A: Evaluating the population health impact of physical activity interventions in primary health care – are we asking the right questions? J Phys Act Health 2005, 2:197-215.
• [32]Owen N, Glanz K, Sallis JF, Kelder SH: Evidence-based approaches to dissemination and diffusion of physical activity interventions. Am J Prev Med 2006, 31(Suppl 4):S35-S44.
• [33]Tooze JA, Grunwald GK, Jones RH: Analysis of repeated measures data with clumping at zero. Stat Methods Med Res 2002, 11:341-355.
• [34]Burton NW, Turrell G, Oldenburg B: Item nonresponse in a population-based mail survey of physical activity. J Phys Act Health 2004, 1:344-362.
• [35]Inoue S, Ohya Y, Odagiri Y, Takamiya T, Kamada M, Okada S, Tudor-Locke C, Shimomitsu T: Characteristics of accelerometry respondents to a mail-based surveillance study. J Epidemiol 2010, 20:446-452.
• [36]Mackay LM, Oliver M, Schofield GM: Demographic variations in discrepancies between objective and subjective measures of physical activity. OJPM 2011, 1:13-19.
• [37]Van der Ploeg HP, Tudor-Locke C, Marshall AL, Hagsrömer M, Sjöström M, Bauman A: Reliability and validity of the international physical activity questionnaire for assessing walking. Res Q Exerc Sport 2010, 81:97-101.
• [38]Powell KE, Heath GW, Kresnow M-J, Sacks JJ, Branche CM: Injury rates from walking, gardening, weightlifting, outdoor bicycling, and aerobics. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998, 30:1246-1249.
• [39]Bennie JA, Timperio AF, Crawford DA, Dunstan DW, Salmon JL: Associations between social ecological factors and self-reported short physical activity breaks during work hours among desk-based employees. Prev Med 2011, 53:44-47.
• [40]Proper KI, Singh AS, van Mechelen W, Chinapaw MJM: Sedentary behaviors and health outcomes among adults. A systematic review of prospective studies. Am J Prev Med 2011, 40:174-182.
• [41]Van Uffelen JGZ, Wong J, van der Ploeg HP Chau JY, Riphagen I, Gilson ND, Burton NW, Healy GN, Thorp AA, Clark BK, Gardiner PA, Dunstan DW, Bauman A, Owen N, Brown WJ: Occupational sitting and health risks. A systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2010, 39:379-388.
• [42]Patel AV, Bernstein L, Deka A, Feigelson HS, Campbell PT, Gapstur SM, Colditz GA, Thun MJ: Leisure time spent sitting in relation to mortality in a prospective cohort of US adults. Am J Epidemiol 2010, 172:419-429.
• [43]Katzmarzyk PT, Church TS, Craig CL, Bouchard C: Sitting time and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009, 41:998-1005.
• [44]Tudor-Locke C, Lutes L: Why do pedometers work? A reflection upon the factors related to successfully increasing physical activity. Sports Med 2009, 39:881-993.