Evaluation of a randomized controlled trial on the effect on return to work with coaching combined with light therapy and pulsed electromagnetic field therapy for workers with work-related chronic stress

BMC Public Health

Research Article

Karen Nieuwenhuijsen¹  Monique H.W. Frings-Dresen¹  Judith K. Sluiter¹  Antonius M.C. Schoutens² 

[1] Department: Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands;FluxPlus BV, Saal van Zwanenbergweg 11, 5026 RM, Tilburg, the Netherlands;

关键词: Work-related chronic stress;    Burnout;    Light therapy;    PEMF;    Return to work;    Fatigue;    Stress;    Quality of life;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12889-017-4720-y

 received in 2017-01-10, accepted in 2017-09-06,  发布年份 2017

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundChronic work-related stress is quite prevalent in the working population and is in some cases accompanied by long-term sick leave. These stress complaints highly impact employees and are costly due to lost productivity and medical expenses. A new treatment platform with light therapy plus Pulsed Electro Magnetic Fields (PEMF) in combination with coaching was used to assess whether more positive effects on return to work, stress, work-related fatigue, and quality of life could be induced compared to coaching alone.MethodsA placebo-controlled trial was executed after inclusion of 96 workers, aged 18–65 with work-related chronic stress complaints and who were on sick leave (either part-time or full-time). Participants were divided into three arms at random. Group 1 (n = 28) received the treatment and coaching (Intervention group), group 2 (n = 28) received the treatment with the device turned off and coaching (Placebo group) and group 3 (n = 28) received coaching only (Control group). The data were collected at baseline, and after 6, 12 and 24 weeks. The primary outcome was % return to work, and secondary outcomes were work-related fatigue (emotional exhaustion and need for recovery after work), stress (distress and hair cortisol), and quality of life (SF-36 dimensions: vitality, emotional role limitation, and social functioning).ResultsEighty-four workers completed all measurements, 28 in each group. All groups improved significantly over time in the level of return to work, as well as on all secondary outcomes. No statistical differences between the three groups were found either on the primary outcome or on any of the secondary outcomes.ConclusionsLight therapy with Pulsed Electro Magnetic Fields PEMF therapy has no additional effect on return to work, stress, fatigue, and quality of live compared to coaching alone.Trial registrationNTR4794, registration date: 18-sep-2014

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2017