期刊论文详细信息
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Prevalence and risk factors of Q fever (Coxiella burnetii) in cattle on farms of Limpopo province, South Africa
Veterinary Science
Nomakorinte Gcebe1  Maruping L. Mangena2  Yusuf B. Ngoshe3  Vhahangwele Sadiki4  Abiodun A. Adesiyun5 
[1] Agricultural Research Council–Bacteriology and Zoonotic Diseases Diagnostic Laboratory, Onderstepoort Veterinary Research, Pretoria, South Africa;Agricultural Research Council–Transboundary Animal Diseases Programme, Onderstepoort Veterinary Research, Onderstepoort, South Africa;Department of Production Animal Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa;Department of Production Animal Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa;Agricultural Research Council–Bacteriology and Zoonotic Diseases Diagnostic Laboratory, Onderstepoort Veterinary Research, Pretoria, South Africa;Department of Production Animal Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa;Faculty of Medical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago;
关键词: IS1111;    PCR;    South Africa;    cattle;    Q fever;    Coxiella burnetii;    ELISA;   
DOI  :  10.3389/fvets.2023.1101988
 received in 2022-11-18, accepted in 2023-03-30,  发布年份 2023
来源: Frontiers
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Q fever in animals and humans and its economic and public health significance has been widely reported worldwide but in South Africa. There are few studies on the prevalence of this zoonosis and its associated risk factors in South African livestock. Therefore, a cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the seroprevalence, molecular prevalence, and risk factors associated with C. burnetii in cattle on farms in South Africa’s Limpopo province. Out of 383 cattle tested for antibodies, the overall seroprevalence was 24.28%. Herd size of >150 (OR: 9.88; 95%CI: 3.92–24.89; p < 0.01) remained associated with C. burnetii seropositivity in cattle. For PCR detection, targeting IS1111 fragment, cattle with no abortion history (OR: 0.37; 95%CI: 0.18–0.77; p < 0.01) and herd size of >150 (OR: 3.52; 95%CI: 1.34–9.24; p < 0.01) remained associated with C. burnetii positivity. The molecular prevalence in sheath scrapings and vaginal swabs by IS1111 PCR was 15.67%. Cohen’s kappa agreement test revealed a fair agreement between the PCR and ELISA results (k = 0.40). Sequence analysis revealed that the amplicons had similarities to the C. burnetii transposase gene fragment, confirming the presence of the pathogen. The higher seroprevalence than molecular prevalence indicated a past C. burnetii infection, no bacterial shedding through vaginal mucus in cows, or preputial discharge in bulls. Similarly, the detection of C. burnetii by PCR in the absence of antibodies could be partly explained by recent infections in which antibodies have not yet been produced against the bacteria, or the level of these antibodies was below the detectability threshold. The presence of the pathogen in cattle and the evidence of exposure, as shown by both PCR and ELISA suggests an active circulation of the pathogen. This study demonstrated that C. burnetii is widespread in the study area and that a herd size of >150 is associated with C. burnetii seroprevalence and molecular prevalence.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   
Copyright © 2023 Sadiki, Gcebe, Mangena, Ngoshe and Adesiyun.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202310104596781ZK.pdf 1400KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:6次 浏览次数:2次