Is it really a challenge to find positive attributes for international medical graduates predictive of success in family medicine residency?

BMC Primary Care

Matters Arising

Laura Blew¹  Malcolm M. MacFarlane¹  Rosemary Pawliuk¹ 

[1] Society for Canadians Studying Medicine Abroad (SOCASMA), 22879-29B Avenue, V2Z 3B1, Langley, BC, Canada;

关键词: International medical graduate;    Bias;    Marginalization;    Residency selection;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12875-023-02105-6

 received in 2022-12-01, accepted in 2023-07-06,  发布年份 2023

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

In their paper “Challenges with international medical graduate selection: finding positive attributes predictive of success in family medicine residency,” (BMC Prim Care 23(256):2–9, 2022) the authors report on their research into qualitative attributes that positively correspond to success in residency with the objective of assisting in the selection of International Medical Graduate (IMG) residents most likely to achieve success in family medicine residency. The authors found that positive predictors of IMG residents’ success were: presence of a positive attitude, proficient communication skills, high level of clinical knowledge, and trainability. The authors conclude that selecting IMG residents who possess these attributes will result in residents developing increased aptitudes for patient care. A careful reading of the paper raises a number of concerns. MacFarlane (Can Med Educ J 12(4):132–40, 2021) points out that IMGs are already marginalized in the residency selection process. Our concern is that this paper may contribute to this marginalization through a tone of negativity or bias against IMGs and the use of biased language throughout the paper that tends to cast IMGs as being inferior and somehow less well prepared for residency than Canadian Medical Graduates (CMGs). We argue that the proposed predictors are generic and equally relevant to both CMGs and IMGs. In focusing on these predictors in IMGs specifically, the paper appears to imply, without evidence, that IMGs are inadequate in the identified areas. After reviewing the paper’s references, the existing literature, and an analysis of language used, we conclude that IMGs are capable candidates for residency, and that the qualitative attributes outlined in the paper offer little utility for the selection of IMG residents relative to CMG residents.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2023