What are the relative risks of mortality and injury for fish during downstream passage at hydroelectric dams in temperate regions? A systematic review

Environmental Evidence

Systematic Review

Joseph R. Bennett¹  Michael Power²  Dirk A. Algera³  Jessica J. Taylor⁴  Trina Rytwinski⁴  Steven J. Cooke⁴  Philip M. Harrison⁵  Eva C. Enders⁶  Karen E. Smokorowski⁷  Keith D. Clarke⁸  Mark S. Bevelhimer⁹ 

[1] Canadian Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation, Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, Canada;Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, Canada;Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave., Waterloo, ON, Canada;Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, Canada;Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, Canada;Canadian Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation, Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, Canada;Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, Canada;Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, Canada;Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave., Waterloo, ON, Canada;Freshwater Institute, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 501 University Crescent, Winnipeg, MB, Canada;Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Science, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 1219 Queen Street East, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, Canada;Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Centre, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 80 East White Hills, St. John’s, NF, Canada;Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1 Bethel Valley Road, Oak Ridge, TN, USA;

关键词: Bypass;    Evidence-based policy;    Hydropower infrastructure;    Injury risk;    Mortality risk;    Spillway;    Turbine;    Temperate fish;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s13750-020-0184-0

 received in 2019-06-02, accepted in 2020-01-03,  发布年份 2020

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundFish injury and mortality resulting from entrainment and/or impingement during downstream passage over/through hydropower infrastructure has the potential to cause negative effects on fish populations. The primary goal of this systematic review was to address two research questions: (1) What are the consequences of hydroelectric dam fish entrainment and impingement on freshwater fish productivity in temperate regions?; (2) To what extent do various factors like site type, intervention type, and life history characteristics influence the consequences of fish entrainment and impingement?MethodsThe review was conducted using guidelines provided by the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence and examined commercially published and grey literature. All articles found using a systematic search were screened using a priori eligibility criteria at two stages (title and abstract, and full-text, respectively), with consistency checks being performed at each stage. The validity of studies was appraised and data were extracted using tools explicitly designed for this review. A narrative synthesis encompassed all relevant studies and a quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis) was conducted where appropriate.Review findingsA total of 264 studies from 87 articles were included for critical appraisal and narrative synthesis. Studies were primarily conducted in the United States (93%) on genera in the Salmonidae family (86%). The evidence base did not allow for an evaluation of the consequences of entrainment/impingement on fish productivity per se; therefore, we evaluated the risk of freshwater fish injury and mortality owing to downstream passage through common hydropower infrastructure. Our quantitative synthesis suggested an overall increased risk of injury and immediate mortality from passage through/over hydropower infrastructure. Injury and immediate mortality risk varied among infrastructure types. Bypasses resulted in decreased injury risk relative to controls, whereas turbines and spillways were associated with the highest injury risks relative to controls. Within turbine studies, those conducted in a lab setting were associated with higher injury risk than field-based studies, and studies with longer assessment time periods (≥ 24–48 h) were associated with higher risk than shorter duration assessment periods (< 24 h). Turbines and sluiceways were associated with the highest immediate mortality risk relative to controls. Within turbine studies, lab-based studies had higher mortality risk ratios than field-based studies. Within field studies, Francis turbines resulted in a higher immediate mortality risk than Kaplan turbines relative to controls, and wild sourced fish had a higher immediate mortality risk than hatchery sourced fish in Kaplan turbines. No other associations between effect size and moderators were identified. Taxonomic analyses revealed a significant increased injury and immediate mortality risk relative to controls for genera Alosa (river herring) and Oncorhynchus (Pacific salmonids), and delayed mortality risk for Anguilla (freshwater eels).ConclusionsOur synthesis suggests that hydropower infrastructure in temperate regions increased the overall risk of freshwater fish injury and immediate mortality relative to controls. The evidence base confirmed that turbines and spillways increase the risk of injury and/or mortality for downstream passing fish compared to controls. Differences in lab- and field-based studies were evident, highlighting the need for further studies to understand the sources of variation among lab- and field-based studies. We were unable to examine delayed mortality, likely due to the lack of consistency in monitoring for post-passage delayed injury and mortality. Our synthesis suggests that bypasses are the most “fish friendly” passage option in terms of reducing fish injury and mortality. To address knowledge gaps, studies are needed that focus on systems outside of North America, on non-salmonid or non-sportfish target species, and on population-level consequences of fish entrainment/impingement.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2020

【 图 表 】

Fig. 2

Fig. 1

Scheme 1

40517_2023_266_Article_IEq43.gif

40517_2023_266_Article_IEq41.gif

40517_2023_266_Article_IEq31.gif

Fig. 1

40517_2023_266_Article_IEq18.gif

Fig. 2

12888_2023_5115_Article_IEq2.gif

40517_2023_266_Article_IEq14.gif

Fig. 2

40517_2023_266_Article_IEq12.gif

Fig. 1

Fig. 4

Fig. 6

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 2

Fig. 1