期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
Dietary fiber during gestation improves lactational feed intake of sows by modulating gut microbiota
Research
Xilun Zhao1  Lianqiang Che1  Yong Zhuo1  Lun Hua1  Ke Wang1  Shuang Li1  Hao Liu1  Bin Feng1  Xuemei Jiang1  Liansu Huang1  Jian Li1  Yan Lin1  Jiaqi He1  Shengyu Xu1  Zhengfeng Fang1  Jie Zheng1  Yingyan Huang1  De Wu1 
[1] Key Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of China Ministry of Education, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, No. 211, Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, 611130, Chengdu, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China;
关键词: Dietary fiber;    Escherichia-Shigella;    Feed intake;    Lactobacillus;    Sow;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s40104-023-00870-z
 received in 2022-11-21, accepted in 2023-03-14,  发布年份 2023
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThe feed intake of sows during lactation is often lower than their needs. High-fiber feed is usually used during gestation to increase the voluntary feed intake of sows during lactation. However, the mechanism underlying the effect of bulky diets on the appetites of sows during lactation have not been fully clarified. The current study was conducted to determine whether a high-fiber diet during gestation improves lactational feed intake (LFI) of sows by modulating gut microbiota.MethodsWe selected an appropriate high-fiber diet during gestation and utilized the fecal microbial transplantation (FMT) method to conduct research on the role of the gut microbiota in feed intake regulation of sows during lactation, as follows: high-fiber (HF) diet during gestation (n = 23), low-fiber (LF) diet during gestation (n = 23), and low-fiber diet + HF-FMT (LFM) during gestation (n = 23).ResultsCompared with the LF, sows in the HF and LFM groups had a higher LFI, while the sows also had higher peptide tyrosine tyrosine and glucagon-like peptide 1 on d 110 of gestation (G110 d). The litter weight gain of piglets during lactation and weaning weight of piglets from LFM group were higher than LF group. Sows given a HF diet had lower Proteobacteria, especially Escherichia-Shigella, on G110 d and higher Lactobacillus, especially Lactobacillus_mucosae_LM1 and Lactobacillus_amylovorus, on d 7 of lactation (L7 d). The abundance of Escherichia-Shigella was reduced by HF-FMT in numerically compared with the LF. In addition, HF and HF-FMT both decreased the perinatal concentrations of proinflammatory factors, such as endotoxin (ET), lipocalin-2 (LCN-2), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interleukin-1β (IL-1β). The concentration of ET and LCN-2 and the abundance of Proteobacteria and Escherichia-Shigella were negatively correlated with the LFI of sows.ConclusionThe high abundance of Proteobacteria, especially Escherichia-Shigella of LF sows in late gestation, led to increased endotoxin levels, which result in inflammatory responses and adverse effects on the LFI of sows. Adding HF during gestation reverses this process by increasing the abundance of Lactobacillus, especially Lactobacillus_mucosae_LM1 and Lactobacillus_amylovorus.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202308159259883ZK.pdf 4096KB PDF download
41116_2023_36_Article_IEq811.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 1 136KB Image download
MediaObjects/12888_2023_4818_MOESM1_ESM.docx 52KB Other download
40517_2023_258_Article_IEq119.gif 1KB Image download
40517_2023_258_Article_IEq122.gif 1KB Image download
40517_2023_258_Article_IEq125.gif 1KB Image download
40517_2023_258_Article_IEq133.gif 1KB Image download
40517_2023_258_Article_IEq68.gif 1KB Image download
40517_2023_256_Article_IEq35.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 3 477KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 3

40517_2023_256_Article_IEq35.gif

40517_2023_258_Article_IEq68.gif

40517_2023_258_Article_IEq133.gif

40517_2023_258_Article_IEq125.gif

40517_2023_258_Article_IEq122.gif

40517_2023_258_Article_IEq119.gif

Fig. 1

41116_2023_36_Article_IEq811.gif

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  • [60]
  • [61]
  • [62]
  • [63]
  • [64]
  • [65]
  • [66]
  • [67]
  • [68]
  • [69]
  • [70]
  • [71]
  • [72]
  • [73]
  • [74]
  • [75]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:2次 浏览次数:0次