PeerJ | |
Exploring perceptions of meaningfulness in visual representations of bivariate relationships | |
article | |
Nataly Beribisky1  Heather Davidson1  Robert A. Cribbie1  | |
[1] Department of Psychology, York University | |
关键词: Effect sizes; Overlapping histograms; Scatterplots; Practical significance; | |
DOI : 10.7717/peerj.6853 | |
学科分类:社会科学、人文和艺术(综合) | |
来源: Inra | |
【 摘 要 】
Researchers often need to consider the practical significance of a relationship. For example, interpreting the magnitude of an effect size or establishing bounds in equivalence testing requires knowledge of the meaningfulness of a relationship. However, there has been little research exploring the degree of relationship among variables (e.g., correlation, mean difference) necessary for an association to be interpreted as meaningful or practically significant. In this study, we presented statistically trained and untrained participants with a collection of figures that displayed varying degrees of mean difference between groups or correlations among variables and participants indicated whether or not each relationship was meaningful. The results suggest that statistically trained and untrained participants differ in their qualification of a meaningful relationship, and that there is significant variability in how large a relationship must be before it is labeled meaningful. The results also shed some light on what degree of relationship is considered meaningful by individuals in a context-free setting.
【 授权许可】
CC BY
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO202307100010459ZK.pdf | 2408KB | download |