Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting and Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents 1-Year Outcomes from the Randomized Evaluation of Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stent Trial (RESET)

Article

关键词: ARTERY-DISEASE;    DIABETES-MELLITUS;    THROMBOSIS;    INTERVENTION;    IMPLANTATION;    METAANALYSIS;    REVASCULARIZATION;    REGISTRY;    LESIONS;    COHORT;   

DOI  :  10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.104059

来源: SCIE

【 摘 要 】

Background-Several recent randomized trials comparing everolimus-eluting stent (EES) and sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) reported similar outcomes. However, only 1 trial was powered for a clinical end point, and no trial was powered for evaluating target-lesion revascularization. Methods and Results-Randomized Evaluation of Sirolimus-eluting versus Everolimus-eluting stent Trial is a prospective multicenter randomized open-label trial comparing EES with SES in Japan. The trial was powered for evaluating noninferiority of EES relative to SES in terms of target-lesion revascularization. From February and July 2010, 3197 patients were randomly assigned to receive either EES (1597 patients) or SES (1600 patients). At 1 year, the primary efficacy end point of target-lesion revascularization occurred in 65 patients (4.3%) in the EES group and in 76 patients (5.0%) in the SES group, demonstrating noninferiority of EES to SES (P-noninferiority<0.0001, and P-superiority=0.34). Cumulative incidence of definite stent thrombosis was low and similar between the 2 groups (0.32% versus 0.38%, P=0.77). An angiographic substudy enrolling 571 patients (EES, 285 patients and SES, 286 patients) demonstrated noninferiority of EES relative to SES regarding the primary angiographic end point of in-segment late loss (0.06 +/- 0.37 mm versus 0.02 +/- 0.46 mm, P-noninferiority<0.0001, and P-superiority=0.24) at 278 +/- 63 days after index stent implantation. Conclusions-One-year clinical and angiographic outcome after EES implantation was noninferior to and not different from that after SES implantation in a stable coronary artery disease population with relatively less complex coronary anatomy. One-year clinical outcome after both EES and SES use was excellent with a low rate of target-lesion revascularization and a very low rate of stent thrombosis. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http:// www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01035450. (Circulation. 2012;126:1225-1236.)

【 授权许可】

Free