BMC Neurology | |
In-stent restenosis and stented-territory infarction after carotid and vertebrobasilar artery stenting | |
Research | |
Bum Joon Kim1  Jae-Chan Ryu1  Jae-Han Bae1  Dong-Wha Kang1  Jun Young Chang1  Sun U. Kwon1  Jong S. Kim2  Sang Hee Ha3  Deok Hee Lee4  Boseong Kwon4  Yunsun Song4  | |
[1] Department of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea;Department of Neurology, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Korea;Department of Neurology, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University, Incheon, Korea;Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; | |
关键词: In-stent restenosis; Ischemic stroke; Carotid stent; Vertebrobasilar stent; | |
DOI : 10.1186/s12883-023-03110-z | |
received in 2022-12-15, accepted in 2023-02-07, 发布年份 2023 | |
来源: Springer | |
【 摘 要 】
BackgroundPrognosis after vertebrobasilar stenting (VBS) may differ from that after carotid artery stenting (CAS). Here, we directly compared the incidence and predictors of in-stent restenosis and stented-territory infarction after VBS and compared them with those of CAS.MethodsWe enrolled patients who underwent VBS or CAS. Clinical variables and procedure-related factors were obtained. During the 3 years of follow-up, in-stent restenosis and infarction were investigated in each group. In-stent restenosis was defined as reduction in the lumen diameter > 50% compared with that after stenting. Factors associated with the occurrence of in-stent restenosis and stented-territory infarction in VBS and CAS were compared.ResultsAmong 417 stent insertions (93 VBS and 324 CAS), there was no statistical difference in in-stent restenosis between VBS and CAS (12.9% vs. 6.8%, P = 0.092). However, stented-territory infarction was more frequently observed in VBS than in CAS (22.6% vs. 10.8%; P = 0.006), especially a month after stent insertion. HbA1c level, clopidogrel resistance, and multiple stents in VBS and young age in CAS increased the risk of in-stent restenosis. Diabetes (3.82 [1.24–11.7]) and multiple stents (22.4 [2.4–206.4]) were associated with stented-territory infarction in VBS. However, in-stent restenosis (odds ratio: 15.1, 95% confidence interval: 3.17–72.2) was associated with stented-territory infarction in CAS.ConclusionsStented-territory infarction occurred more frequently in VBS, especially after the periprocedural period. In-stent restenosis was associated with stented-territory infarction after CAS, but not in VBS. The mechanism of stented-territory infarction after VBS may be different from that after CAS.
【 授权许可】
CC BY
© The Author(s) 2023
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO202305151142516ZK.pdf | 935KB | download | |
MediaObjects/13045_2023_1400_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx | 27KB | Other | download |
13690_2023_1029_Article_IEq5.gif | 1KB | Image | download |
【 图 表 】
13690_2023_1029_Article_IEq5.gif
【 参考文献 】
- [1]
- [2]
- [3]
- [4]
- [5]
- [6]
- [7]
- [8]
- [9]
- [10]
- [11]
- [12]
- [13]
- [14]
- [15]
- [16]
- [17]
- [18]
- [19]
- [20]
- [21]
- [22]
- [23]
- [24]
- [25]