期刊论文详细信息
BMC Neurology
In-stent restenosis and stented-territory infarction after carotid and vertebrobasilar artery stenting
Research
Bum Joon Kim1  Jae-Chan Ryu1  Jae-Han Bae1  Dong-Wha Kang1  Jun Young Chang1  Sun U. Kwon1  Jong S. Kim2  Sang Hee Ha3  Deok Hee Lee4  Boseong Kwon4  Yunsun Song4 
[1] Department of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea;Department of Neurology, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Korea;Department of Neurology, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University, Incheon, Korea;Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea;
关键词: In-stent restenosis;    Ischemic stroke;    Carotid stent;    Vertebrobasilar stent;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12883-023-03110-z
 received in 2022-12-15, accepted in 2023-02-07,  发布年份 2023
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundPrognosis after vertebrobasilar stenting (VBS) may differ from that after carotid artery stenting (CAS). Here, we directly compared the incidence and predictors of in-stent restenosis and stented-territory infarction after VBS and compared them with those of CAS.MethodsWe enrolled patients who underwent VBS or CAS. Clinical variables and procedure-related factors were obtained. During the 3 years of follow-up, in-stent restenosis and infarction were investigated in each group. In-stent restenosis was defined as reduction in the lumen diameter > 50% compared with that after stenting. Factors associated with the occurrence of in-stent restenosis and stented-territory infarction in VBS and CAS were compared.ResultsAmong 417 stent insertions (93 VBS and 324 CAS), there was no statistical difference in in-stent restenosis between VBS and CAS (12.9% vs. 6.8%, P = 0.092). However, stented-territory infarction was more frequently observed in VBS than in CAS (22.6% vs. 10.8%; P = 0.006), especially a month after stent insertion. HbA1c level, clopidogrel resistance, and multiple stents in VBS and young age in CAS increased the risk of in-stent restenosis. Diabetes (3.82 [1.24–11.7]) and multiple stents (22.4 [2.4–206.4]) were associated with stented-territory infarction in VBS. However, in-stent restenosis (odds ratio: 15.1, 95% confidence interval: 3.17–72.2) was associated with stented-territory infarction in CAS.ConclusionsStented-territory infarction occurred more frequently in VBS, especially after the periprocedural period. In-stent restenosis was associated with stented-territory infarction after CAS, but not in VBS. The mechanism of stented-territory infarction after VBS may be different from that after CAS.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202305151142516ZK.pdf 935KB PDF download
MediaObjects/13045_2023_1400_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx 27KB Other download
13690_2023_1029_Article_IEq5.gif 1KB Image download
【 图 表 】

13690_2023_1029_Article_IEq5.gif

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:1次 浏览次数:0次