Learning to Beat the Shock Clock: A Low-Fidelity Simulation Board Game for Pediatric and Emergency Medicine Residents

MedEdPORTAL

Catherine E. Foster¹  Kathy L. Lehman-Huskamp²  Rachel E. Tuuri³  E. Page Bridges⁴  Dan B. Park⁵  Dan W. Mark⁶ 

[1] Assistant Clerkship Director, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville;Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Infectious Diseases, Texas Children's Hospital;Director of Pediatric Emergency Ultrasound, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina Children's Hospital;1 Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville;2 Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Infectious Diseases, Baylor College of Medicine;3 Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina Children's Hospital;

关键词: Residents;    Septic Shock;    Pediatric Sepsis;    Severe Sepsis;    Low-Fidelity Simulation;   

DOI  :  10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10804

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Introduction Resident physicians may have difficulty with identifying and managing pediatric septic shock due to limited patient encounters. Simulation-based interventions can enhance competency. We developed a low-fidelity tabletop simulation game to teach pediatric septic shock and compared residents' knowledge of and comfort with recognition and management of septic shock. Methods Pediatric and emergency medicine residents participated in an education session involving a low-fidelity, tabletop simulation in which they managed two simulated pediatric patients with septic shock. The two patients were a 12-year-old healthy male with cold shock due to a urinary tract infection and a 5-year-old female with a history of leukemia who developed warm shock due to pneumonia. Because this session was presented as a board game rather than high-fidelity simulation, learners focused on decision making rather than the mechanics of procedures. Residents completed a survey and a knowledge-based test before and after this session. Results Twenty-three pediatric and nine emergency medicine residents participated. Correct responses for the preintervention test were 71%, compared with 83% postintervention. The difference in rates was 12% (95% confidence interval, −0.17 to −0.07; p < .0001). Residents rated this modality as being more useful than lectures or reading and as equivalent to bedside teaching and high-fidelity simulation. Discussion Our pilot low-fidelity simulation improved resident knowledge and comfort with pediatric septic shock care. Further studies are needed to address the impact of low-fidelity simulations on patient outcomes.

【 授权许可】

Unknown