Comparison of standard-setting methods for the Korean Radiological Technologist Licensing Examination: Angoff, Ebel, bookmark, and Hofstee

Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions

Janghee Park¹  Mi Kyoung Yim²  Jaehyoung Lee²  Duck-Sun Ahn³ 

[1] Department of Medical Education, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Asan, Korea;Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute, Seoul, Korea;Research institute for healthcare policy, Seoul, Korea;

关键词: licensure;    education;    radiological technologist;    standard setting;    modified-angoff;    ebel;    bookmark;    hofstee;   

DOI  :  10.3352/jeehp.2018.15.32

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Purpose This study aimed to compare the possible standard-setting methods for the Korean Radiological Technologist Licensing Examination, which has a fixed cut score, and to suggest the most appropriate method. Methods Six radiological technology professors set standards for 250 items on the Korean Radiological Technologist Licensing Examination administered in December 2016 using the Angoff, Ebel, bookmark, and Hofstee methods. Results With a maximum percentile score of 100, the cut score for the examination was 71.27 using the Angoff method, 62.2 using the Ebel method, 64.49 using the bookmark method, and 62 using the Hofstee method. Based on the Hofstee method, an acceptable cut score for the examination would be between 52.83 and 70, but the cut score was 71.27 using the Angoff method. Conclusion The above results suggest that the best standard-setting method to determine the cut score would be a panel discussion with the modified Angoff or Ebel method, with verification of the rated results by the Hofstee method. Since no standard-setting method has yet been adopted for the Korean Radiological Technologist Licensing Examination, this study will be able to provide practical guidance for introducing a standard-setting process.

【 授权许可】

Unknown