Stigmatized for standing up for my child: A qualitative study of non-vaccinating parents in Australia

SSM: Population Health

卷:16

Julie Leask¹  Catherine Helps²  Lesley Barclay³  Paul R. Ward⁴  Katie Attwell⁵  Kerrie E. Wiley⁵  Stacy M. Carter⁶ 

[1] Corresponding author.;

[2] Sydney Nursing School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Australia;

[3] School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Business, Law and Education, University of Western Australia, Australia;

[4] Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Sydney, Australia;

[5] University Centre for Rural Health, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Australia;

关键词: Australia;    Immunization;    Childhood vaccination;    Vaccine refusal;    Public health;    Qualitative research;   

DOI  :  

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Background: Vaccine refusal is highly polarizing in Australia, producing a challenging social landscape for non-vaccinating parents. We sought to understand the lived experience of non-vaccinating parents in contemporary Australia. Methods: We recruited a national sample of non-vaccinating parents of children <18 yrs, advertising on national radio, in playgrounds in low vaccination areas, and using snowballing. Grounded Theory methodology guided data collection (via semi-structured interviews). Inductive analysis identified stigmatization as a central concept; stigma theory was adopted as an analytical lens. Results: Twenty-one parents from regional and urban locations in five states were interviewed. Parent's described experiences point to systematic stigmatization which can be characterized using Link & Phelan's five-step process. Parents experienced (1) labelling and (2) stereotyping, with many not identifying with the “anti-vaxxers” portrayed in the media and describing frustration at being labelled as such, believing they were defending their child from harm. Participants described (3) social “othering”, leading to relationship loss and social isolation, and (4) status loss and discrimination, feeling “brushed off” as incompetent parents and discriminated against by medical professionals and other parents. Finally, (5) legislative changes exerted power over their circumstances, rendering them unable to provide their children with the same financial and educational opportunities as vaccinated children, often increasing their steadfastness in refusing vaccination. Conclusion: Non-vaccinating Australian parents feel stigmatized for defending their child from perceived risk of harm, reporting a range of social and psychological effects, as well as financial effects from policies which disadvantaged their children through differential financial treatment, and diminished early childhood educational opportunities. While it might be argued that social stigma and exclusionary policies directed a small minority for the greater good are justified, other more nuanced approaches based on better understandings of vaccine rejection could achieve comparable public health outcomes without the detrimental effect on unvaccinated families.

【 授权许可】

Unknown