Tensions at the boundary: Rearticulating ‘organic’ plant breeding in the age of gene editing

Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene

卷:8

Alexandra Lyon¹  Susanna Klassen²  Sara Nawaz² 

[1] Centre for Sustainable Food Systems, The University of British Columbia, British Columbia;

[2] Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, The University of British Columbia, British Columbia;

关键词: gene editing;    crispr-cas9;    organic agriculture;    plant breeding;    genomics;    biotechnology;   

DOI  :  10.1525/elementa.429

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

A host of technologies is rapidly entering agriculture. These new technologies—particularly gene editing—represent multifaceted shifts beyond “genetic modification” (GM), and are outpacing both public understanding and the capacity of regulatory regimes. This paper employs the case of the organic sectors in Canada and the United States, strongholds of GM resistance, to examine conversations about gene-editing technologies unfolding within the organic community, and elucidate their implications for the sector. We employ the concept of “boundary work” to illuminate how key actors and institutions delineate the concept of organic breeding in the face of emerging technologies. We draw upon semi-structured interviews with organic sector representatives, a review of documents published by organic organizations, and data from participant observation. We find that the organic community is reaffirming and deepening boundaries in response to arguments made by proponents of gene editing. Both internal and external pressures on the sector are facilitating a dampening effect on conversations about the boundaries between gene editing and organic agriculture, as the sector is compelled to present a united voice against the affront of new genetic technologies. The sector is also redrawing existing boundaries, as the advent of gene editing has forced conversations about the compatibility of both new and established breeding methods with organic. The resulting questions about what distinguishes acceptable levels of human intervention in plant genomes are highlighting some differences within the diverse organic community. We also argue that debates about gene editing and organic breeding may be “bounding out” important actors from deliberation processes, and note initial attempts to reckon with this exclusion.

【 授权许可】

Unknown