期刊论文详细信息
BMC Nephrology
Longitudinal monitoring of mRNA levels of regulatory T cell biomarkers by using non-invasive strategies to predict outcome in renal transplantation
Angelica Canossi1  Tiziana Del Beato1  Alessandra Tessitore2  Samuele Iesari3  Francesco Pisani4  Quirino Lai5  Alessandra Panarese6  Barbara Binda6  Simone Ciavatta6  Franco Papola7 
[1]CNR Institute for Translational Pharmacology, Via Giosuè Carducci 32C, 67100, L’Aquila, Italy
[2]Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Via Vetoio, Coppito 2, 67100, L’Aquila, Italy
[3]Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Via Vetoio, Coppito 2, 67100, L’Aquila, Italy
[4]Pôle de Chirurgie Expérimentale et Transplantation, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate 55, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
[5]Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Via Vetoio, Coppito 2, 67100, L’Aquila, Italy
[6]Regional Center for Organ Transplantation (CRT), S. Salvatore Hospital, Via Lorenzo Natali 1, 67100, L’Aquila, Italy
[7]Hepatobiliary and Organ Transplantation Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy
[8]Regional Center for Organ Transplantation (CRT), S. Salvatore Hospital, Via Lorenzo Natali 1, 67100, L’Aquila, Italy
[9]Regional Centre of Immunohematology and Tissue Typing, San Salvatore Hospital, Via Lorenzo Natali 1, 67100, L’Aquila, Italy
关键词: CTLA-4;    FOXP3;    RT-PCR;    Kidney transplantation;    Cellular acute rejection;    DSA development;    Graft dysfunction;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12882-021-02608-3
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】
BackgroundAcute T-cell mediated rejection (aTCMR) is still an issue in kidney transplantation, for it is associated with chronic rejection, graft loss, and overall worse outcomes. For these reasons, a standard non-invasive molecular tool to detect is desirable to offer a simpler monitoring of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). The purpose of our study was to examine, in peripheral blood before and after transplantation, the expression patterns of regulatory T cell (Treg)-related genes: the forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) and the two CTLA-4 isoforms (full-length and soluble) to predict acute rejection onset, de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) development and renal dysfunction 1 year after transplantation.MethodsWe profiled by using a relative quantification analysis (qRT-PCR) circulating mRNA levels of these biomarkers in peripheral blood of 89 KTRs within the first post-transplant year (at baseline and 15, 60 and 365 days, and when possible at the acute rejection) and compared also the results with 24 healthy controls.ResultsThe three mRNA levels drastically reduced 15 days after transplantation and gradually recovered at 1 year in comparison with baseline, with very low levels at the time of aTCMR for FOXP3 (RQ = 0.445, IQR = 0.086–1.264, p = 0.040), maybe for the pro-apoptotic role of FOXP3 during inflammation. A multivariate Cox regression analysis evidenced a significant relation between aTCMR onset and thymoglobuline induction (HR = 6.749 p = 0.041), everolimus use (HR = 7.017, p = 0.007) and an increased risk from the solCTLA-4 expression at 15 days, mainly considering recipients treated with Mycophelolic acid (HR = 13.94 p = 0.038, 95%CI:1.157–167.87). Besides, solCTLA-4 also predisposed to graft dysfunction (eGFR< 60 mL/min/1.73m2) at 1 year (AOR = 3.683, 95%CI = 1.145–11.845, p = 0.029). On the other hand, pre-transplant solCTLA-4 levels showed a protective association with de novo DSAs development (HR = 0.189, 95%CI = 0.078–0.459, p < 0.001).ConclusionsmRNA levels of Treg-associated genes, mainly for solCTLA-4, in peripheral blood could put forward as candidate non-invasive biomarkers of cellular and humoral alloreactivity in clinical transplantation and might help shape immunosuppression, tailor monitoring and achieve better long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation in the wake of “precision medicine”.
【 授权许可】

CC BY   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202202172457924ZK.pdf 1655KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:4次 浏览次数:7次