Misinformation on social networks during the novel coronavirus pandemic: a quali-quantitative case study of Brazil

BMC Public Health

Priscila Biancovilli¹  Claudia Jurberg²  Lilla Makszin³ 

[1] Doctoral School of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary;Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Oncobiology Program, Institute of Medical Biochemistry Leopoldo de Meis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil;Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil;Institute of Bioanalysis, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary;Szentágothai Research Center, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary;

关键词: COVID-19;    Coronavirus;    Misinformation;    Social media;    Politics;    Brazil;    Pandemic;    Fact check;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12889-021-11165-1

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundOne of the challenges posed by the novel coronavirus pandemic is the infodemic risk, that is, a huge amount of information being published on the topic, along with misinformation and rumours; with social media, this phenomenon is amplified, and it goes faster and further. Around 100 million people in Brazil (50% of the inhabitants) are users of social media networks – almost half of the country’s population. Most of the information on the Internet is unregulated, and its quality remains questionable.MethodsIn this study, we examine the main characteristics of misinformation published on the topic. We analysed 232 pieces of misinformation published by the Brazilian fact-checking service “Agência Lupa”. The following aspects of each news item were analysed: a) In what social media has it circulated?; b) What is the content classification, sentiment and type of misinformation?; d) Are there recurrent themes in the sample studied?ResultsMost were published on Facebook (76%), followed by WhatsApp, with 10% of total cases. Half of the stories (47%) are classified as “real-life”, that is, the focus is on everyday situations, or circumstances involving people. Regarding the type of misinformation, there is a preponderance of fabricated content, with 53% of total, followed by false context (34%) and misleading content (13%). Wrong information was mostly published in text format (47%). We found that 92.9% of misinformation classified as “fabricated content” are “health tips”, and 88.9% of “virtual scams” are also fabricated.ConclusionBrazilian media and science communicators must understand the main characteristics of misinformation in social media about COVID-19, so that they can develop attractive, up-to-date and evidence-based content that helps to increase health literacy and counteract the spread of false information.

【 授权许可】

CC BY