Background
Studies suggest that intranasal vaccination can stimulate nonspecific immunity against agents not contained within the vaccine, but this effect is not reported for cats.
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine | |
Efficacy of Intranasal Administration of a Modified Live Feline Herpesvirus 1 and Feline Calicivirus Vaccine against Disease Caused by Bordetella bronchiseptica after Experimental Challenge | |
A. Bradley2  J. Kinyon1  T. Frana1  D. Bolte3  D.R. Hyatt3  | |
[1] Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Iowa State University, Ames, IA;Department of Clinical Sciences, Fort Collins, CO;Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO | |
关键词: Cat; Innate; Immunity; Respiratory; Virus; | |
DOI : 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2012.00982.x | |
来源: Wiley | |
Studies suggest that intranasal vaccination can stimulate nonspecific immunity against agents not contained within the vaccine, but this effect is not reported for cats. A modified live feline herpesvirus-1 (FHV-1) and feline calicivirus (FCV) intranasal vaccine will reduce clinical signs of disease caused by experimental infection with Bordetella bronchiseptica. Twenty specific pathogen-free 12-week-old kittens. Experimental study. Cats were randomized into 2 groups of 10 cats each. The vaccinated group was administered a single intranasal dose of a commercially available vaccine containing modified live strains of FHV-1 and FCV, and the control group remained unvaccinated. All 20 cats were administered B. bronchiseptica by nasal inoculation 7 days later and were observed daily for clinical signs of illness for 20 days. In the first 10 days after B. bronchiseptica challenge, vaccinated cats were less likely to be clinically ill than control cats with a median clinical score of 0/180 (range 0–5) versus 2/180 (range 0–8) (P = .01). Nine of 10 control cats and 2 of 10 vaccinated cats were recorded as sneezing during days 1–10 after challenge (P = .006). Intranasal vaccination against FHV-1 and FCV decreased signs of illness due to an infectious agent not contained in the vaccine. This nonspecific immunity could be beneficial for protection against organisms for which vaccines are not available and as protection before development of vaccine-induced humoral immunity.Abstract
Background
Hypothesis
Animals
Methods
Results
Conclusions and Clinical Importance
Unknown
Copyright © 2012 by the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO202107150006916ZK.pdf | 106KB | download |