Readability of online COVID-19 health information: a comparison between four English speaking countries

BMC Public Health

Cora McNally¹  Eoghan de Barra²  Samuel J. McConkey²  Murray O’Doherty³  Amy P. Worrall³  Aine O’Neill³  Kenneth P. Thornton⁴  Mary J. Connolly⁴ 

[1] Department of Infectious Diseases, Beaumont Hospital, 9, Dublin, Ireland;Department of Infectious Diseases, Beaumont Hospital, 9, Dublin, Ireland;Department of International Health and Tropical Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland;Department of Infectious Diseases, Beaumont Hospital, 9, Dublin, Ireland;Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland;Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland;Department of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland;

关键词: COVID-19;    Coronarvirus pandemic;    Health information;    Readability;    Health literacy;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12889-020-09710-5

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThe internet is now the first line source of health information for many people worldwide. In the current Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic, health information is being produced, revised, updated and disseminated at an increasingly rapid rate. The general public are faced with a plethora of misinformation regarding COVID-19 and the readability of online information has an impact on their understanding of the disease. The accessibility of online healthcare information relating to COVID-19 is unknown. We sought to evaluate the readability of online information relating to COVID-19 in four English speaking regions: Ireland, the United Kingdom, Canada and the United States, and compare readability of website source provenance and regional origin.MethodsThe Google® search engine was used to collate the first 20 webpage URLs for three individual searches for ‘COVID’, ‘COVID-19’, and ‘coronavirus’ from Ireland, the United Kingdom, Canada and the United States. The Gunning Fog Index (GFI), Flesch-Kincaid Grade (FKG) Score, Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) score were calculated to assess the readability.ResultsThere were poor levels of readability webpages reviewed, with only 17.2% of webpages at a universally readable level. There was a significant difference in readability between the different webpages based on their information source (p < 0.01). Public Health organisations and Government organisations provided the most readable COVID-19 material, while digital media sources were significantly less readable. There were no significant differences in readability between regions.ConclusionMuch of the general public have relied on online information during the pandemic. Information on COVID-19 should be made more readable, and those writing webpages and information tools should ensure universal accessibility is considered in their production. Governments and healthcare practitioners should have an awareness of the online sources of information available, and ensure that readability of our own productions is at a universally readable level which will increase understanding and adherence to health guidelines.

【 授权许可】

CC BY