Medical decision making among patients with heart failure – does migration background matter?

BMC Family Practice

Gabriella Marx¹  Martin Scherer¹  Sarah Koens²  Olaf von dem Knesebeck² 

[1] Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20146, Hamburg, Germany;Institute of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20146, Hamburg, Germany;

关键词: Heart failure;    Primary care;    Medical decisions;    Migration;    Treatment;    Disparities;    Germany;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12875-020-01260-4

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundSome studies, mainly coming from the U.S., indicate disparities in heart failure (HF) treatment according to migration/ethnicity. However, respective results are inconsistent and cannot be transferred to other health care systems. Thus, we will address the following research question: Are there differences in the diagnosis and management of HF between patients with and without a Turkish migration background in Germany?MethodsA factorial experimental design with video vignettes was applied. In the filmed simulated initial encounters, professional actors played patients, who consulted a primary care physician because of typical HF symptoms. While the dialog was identical in all videos, patients differed in terms of Turkish migration history (no/yes), sex (male/female), and age (55 years/75 years). After viewing the video, primary care physicians (N = 128) were asked standardized and open ended questions concerning their decisions on diagnosis and therapy.ResultsAnalyses revealed no statistically significant differences (p < 0.05), but a consistent tendency: Primary care doctors more often asked lifestyle and psychosocial questions, they more often diagnosed HF, they gave more advice to rest and how to behave in case of deterioration, they more often auscultated the lung, and more often referred to a specialist when the patient has a Turkish migration history compared to a non-migrant patient. Differences in the medical decisions between the two groups ranged between 1.6 and 15.8%. In 10 out of 12 comparisons, differences were below 10%.ConclusionsOur results indicate that are no significant inequalities in diagnosis and management of HF according to a Turkish migration background in Germany. Primary care physicians’ behaviour and medical decision making do not seem to be influenced by the migration background of the patients. Future studies are needed to verify this result and to address inequalities in HF therapy in an advanced disease stage.

【 授权许可】

CC BY