Multivariable analysis of factors associated with USMLE scores across U.S. medical schools

BMC Medical Education

J. Douglas Miles¹  Rui Fang¹  Rachel Elizabeth Lee¹  Arash Ghaffari-Rafi² 

[1] 0000 0001 2188 0957, grid.410445.0, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, Hawai‘i, USA;0000 0001 2188 0957, grid.410445.0, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, Hawai‘i, USA;0000000121901201, grid.83440.3b, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK;

关键词: United States medical licensing examination;    USMLE;    Evaluation;    Student learning;    Curriculum;    Assessment;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12909-019-1605-z

来源: publisher

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundGauging medical education quality has always remained challenging. Many studies have examined predictors of standardized exam performance; however, data sets do not distinguish by institution or curriculum. Our objective is to present a summary of variables associated with the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores, and thus identify institutions (and therefore curriculums) which deviate from trend lines by producing higher USMLE scores despite having lower entrance grade point averages and medical college admissions test (MCAT) scores.MethodsData was obtained from U.S. News and World Report’s 2014 evaluation of allopathic U.S. medical schools. A univariate analysis was performed first for each variable using two sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test for categorical variables, and Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients for continuous variables. A multivariable linear regression model was developed to identify the factors contributing to USMLE scores. All statistical analyses were two-sided and performed using SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).ResultsUnivariate analysis reveals a significant association between USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores with medical college admissions test scores, grade point averages, school type (private vs. public), full-time faculty-to-student ratio, National Institute of Health funds, residency director assessment score, peer assessment score, and class size. Of these nine variables, MCAT scores and Step 1 scores display the strongest correlation (corr = 0.72, P < .0001). Multivariable analysis also supports a significant association between MCAT scores and Step scores, meanwhile National Institute of Health funding size demonstrates a negative correlation with USMLE Step 2 scores. Although MCAT scores and National Institute of Health funds are significantly associated with USMLE performance, six outlier institutions were identified, producing higher USMLE scores than trend line predictions.ConclusionsOutlier institutions produce USMLE scores that do not follow expected trend lines. Their performance might be explainable by differences in curriculum. Having identified these institutions, their curriculums can be further studied to determine what factors enhance student learning.

【 授权许可】

CC BY