Association Claims in the Sequencing Era

Genes

Sara L. Pulit¹  Maarten Leusink¹  Androniki Menelaou¹ 

[1] Department of Medical Genetics, Institute for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG, Utrecht, The Netherlands; E-Mails:

关键词: association;    GWAS;    next-generation sequencing;    significance;    bias;    complex traits;   

DOI  :  10.3390/genes5010196

来源: mdpi

【 摘 要 】

Since the completion of the Human Genome Project, the field of human genetics has been in great flux, largely due to technological advances in studying DNA sequence variation. Although community-wide adoption of statistical standards was key to the success of genome-wide association studies, similar standards have not yet been globally applied to the processing and interpretation of sequencing data. It has proven particularly challenging to pinpoint unequivocally disease variants in sequencing studies of polygenic traits. Here, we comment on a number of factors that may contribute to irreproducible claims of association in scientific literature and discuss possible steps that we can take towards cultural change.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.