| SAGE Open | |
| Maintaining Scholarly Standards in Feminist Literature: The Case of Mileva MariÄ, Einsteinâs First Wife | |
| Allen Esterson1  | |
| 关键词: history of science; feminism; knowledge; scholarship; scepticism; | |
| DOI : 10.1177/2158244013478014 | |
| 学科分类:社会科学、人文和艺术(综合) | |
| 来源: Sage Journals | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
In the editorial Introduction to Women, Science, and Technology: A Reader in Feminist Science Studies, published in 2001, can be found the exemplary statement that among the norms for acquiring scientific knowledge is âskepticism (all claims should be scrutinized for errors)â. In this article, I address a section relating to historical contentions in the same volume that, I argue, fails to live up to this basic standard of scholarly research. It is now quite widely believed that Mileva MariÄ, Einsteinâs first wife, played an active role in Einsteinâs early scientific work until well after they married in 1903. Some commentators go so far as to argue that she coauthored his three major 1905 papers, while others contend that she solved the mathematical problems for him. I examine the claims made in relation to MariÄ in the section in question in the above-cited volume, and investigate the sources of the evidential claims that have been adduced to support them. I conclude that the several claims are without reliable evidential bases.
【 授权许可】
CC BY
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| RO201902022051340ZK.pdf | 97KB |
PDF