Team behaviors in emergency care: a qualitative study using behavior analysis of what makes team work

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine

Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz¹  Helena Hvitfeldt Forsberg²  Pamela Mazzocato² 

[1] Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden;Medical Management Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management, and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

关键词: teamwork;    Sweden;    process redesign;    implementation;    emergency department;    communication;    Accident and emergency department;   

Others  :  826875
DOI  :  10.1186/1757-7241-19-70

 received in 2011-08-26, accepted in 2011-11-15,  发布年份 2011

【 摘 要 】

Objective

Teamwork has been suggested as a promising approach to improving care processes in emergency departments (ED). However, for teamwork to yield expected results, implementation must involve behavior changes. The aim of this study is to use behavior analysis to qualitatively examine how teamwork plays out in practice and to understand eventual discrepancies between planned and actual behaviors.

Methods

The study was set in a Swedish university hospital ED during the initial phase of implementation of teamwork. The intervention focused on changing the environment and redesigning the work process to enable teamwork. Each team was responsible for entire care episodes, i.e. from patient arrival to discharge from the ED. Data was collected through 3 days of observations structured around an observation scheme. Behavior analysis was used to pinpoint key teamwork behaviors for consistent implementation of teamwork and to analyze the contingencies that decreased or increased the likelihood of these behaviors.

Results

We found a great discrepancy between the planned and the observed teamwork processes. 60% of the 44 team patients observed were handled solely by the appointed team members. Only 36% of the observed patient care processes started according to the description in the planned teamwork process, that is, with taking patient history together. Beside this behavior, meeting in a defined team room and communicating with team members were shown to be essential for the consistent implementation of teamwork. Factors that decreased the likelihood of these key behaviors included waiting for other team members or having trouble locating each other. Getting work done without delay and having an overview of the patient care process increased team behaviors. Moreover, explicit instructions on when team members should interact and communicate increased adherence to the planned process.

Conclusions

This study illustrates how behavior analysis can be used to understand discrepancies between planned and observed behaviors. By examining the contextual conditions that may influence behaviors, improvements in implementation strategies can be suggested. Thereby, the adherence to a planned intervention can be improved, and/or revisions of the intervention be suggested.

【 授权许可】

   
2011 Mazzocato et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Derlet RW, Richards JR: Overcrowding in the Nation's emergency departments: Complex causes and disturbing effects. Ann Emerg Med 2000, 35:63-68.
• [2]Olshaker JS: Managing Emergency Department Overcrowding. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2009, 27:593-603.
• [3]Bernstein SL, Asplin BR: Emergency Department Crowding: Old Problem, New Solutions. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2006, 24:821-837.
• [4]Solberg LI, Asplin BR, Weinick RM, Magid DJ: Emergency department crowding: Consensus development of potential measures. Ann Emerg Med 2003, 42:824-834.
• [5]Willoughby KA, Chan BTB, Strenger M: Achieving wait time reduction in the emergency department. Leadersh Health Serv 2010, 23:304-319.
• [6]Eitel DR, Rudkin SE, Malvehy MA, Killeen JP, Pines JM: Improving Service Quality by Understanding Emergency Department Flow: A White Paper and Position Statement Prepared For the American Academy of Emergency Medicine. J Emerg Med 2010, 38:70-79.
• [7]Dickson EW, Anguelov Z, Vetterick D, Eller A, Singh S: Use of Lean in the Emergency Department: A Case Series of 4 Hospitals. Ann Emerg Med 2009, 54:504-510.
• [8]Kelly A-E, Bryant M, Cox L, Jolley D: Improving emergency department efficieny by patient streaming to outcomes-based teams. Aust Health Rev 2007, 31:16-21.
• [9]Holden RJ: Lean Thinking in Emergency Departments: A Critical Review. Ann Emerg Med 2011, 57:265-278.
• [10]Cronin JG, Wright J: Rapid assessment and initial patient treatment team - a way forward for emergency care. Accid Emerg Nurs 2005, 13:87-92.
• [11]Subash F: Team triage improves emergency department efficiency. Emerg Med J 2004, 21:542-544.
• [12]Oredsson S, Jonsson H, Rognes J, Lind L, Goransson KE, Ehrenberg A, Asplund K, Castren M, Farrohknia N: A systematic review of triage-related interventions to improve patient flow in emergency departments. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2011, 19:43. BioMed Central Full Text
• [13]Merien AE, van de Ven J, Mol BW, Houterman S, Oei SG: Multidisciplinary team training in a simulation setting for acute obstetric emergencies: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2010, 115:1021-1031.
• [14]Salas E, DiazGranados D, Weaver SJ, King H: Does team training work? Principles for health care. Acad Emerg Med 2008, 15:1002-1009.
• [15]Weaver SJ, Lyons R, DiazGranados D, Rosen MA, Salas E, Oglesby J, Augenstein JS, Birnbach DJ, Robinson D, King HB: The anatomy of health care team training and the state of practice: a critical review. Acad Med 2010, 85:1746-1760.
• [16]Fixsen DL, Naoom SF, Blase KA, Friedman RM, Wallace F: Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. In Book Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature (Editor ed.^eds.). City: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network; 2005.
• [17]Jeffcott SA, Mackenzie CF: Measuring team performance in healthcare: review of research and implications for patient safety. J Crit Care 2008, 23:188-196.
• [18]Morey JC, Simon R, Jay GD, Wears RL, Salisbury M, Dukes KA, Berns SD: Error reduction and performance improvement in the emergency department through formal teamwork training: evaluation results of the MedTeams project. Health Serv Res 2002, 37:1553-1581.
• [19]Group TICEtBR: Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions. Implement Sci 2006, 1:4.
• [20]Davies P, Walker AE, Grimshaw JM: A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations. Implement Sci 2010, 5:14. BioMed Central Full Text
• [21]Skinner BF: Operant behavior. Am Psychol 1963., 18
• [22]Braksick LW: Unlock Behavior, Unleash Profits. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1999.
• [23]Dickson EW, Singh S, Cheung DS, Wyatt CC, Nugent AS: Application of Lean Manufacturing Techniques in the Emergency Department. J Emerg Med 2009, 37:177-182.
• [24]Durso FT, Sethumadhavan A: Situation Awareness: Understanding Dynamic Environments. Hum Factors 2008, 50:442-448.
• [25]Wright MC, Endsley MR: Building shared awareness in healthcare settings. In Improving Healthcare Team Communication. Edited by Nemeth CP. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing; 2008.
• [26]Westli H, Johnsen B, Eid J, Rasten I, Brattebo G: Teamwork skills, shared mental models, and performance in simulated trauma teams: an independent group design. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2010, 18:47. BioMed Central Full Text
• [27]Mercer LM, Tanabe P, Pang PS, Gisondi MA, Courtney DM, Engel KG, Donlan SM, Adams JG, Makoul G: Patient perspectives on communication with the medical team: Pilot study using the communication assessment tool-team (CAT-T). Patient Educ Couns 2008, 73:220-223.
• [28]Eisenberg EM, Murphy AG, Sutcliffe K, Wears R, Schenkel S, Perry S, Vanderhoef M: Communication in Emergency Medicine: Implications for Patient Safety. Commun Monogr 2005, 72:390-413.
• [29]Laxmisan A, Hakimzada F, Sayan OR, Green RA, Zhang J, Patel VL: The multitasking clinician: Decision-making and cognitive demand during and after team handoffs in emergency care. Int J Med Inform 2007, 76:801-811.
• [30]Kilner E, Sheppard LA: The role of teamwork and communication in the emergency department: A systematic review. Int Emerg Nurs 2010, 18:127-137.
• [31]Coiera EW, Jayasuriya RA, Hardy J, Bannan A, Thorpe ME: Communication loads on clinical staff in the emergency department. Med J Aust 2002, 176:415-418.
• [32]Root Causes: A Failure to Communicate: Identifying and Overcoming Communication Barriers Joint Commission Perspectives on Patient Safety 2002, 2:4-5.
• [33]Risser DT, Rice MM, Salisbury ML, Simon R, JayI GD, Berns SD, Consortium TMR: The potential for improved teamwork to reduce medical errors in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 1999, 34:373-383.
• [34]Lau FL, Leung KP: Waiting time in an urban accident and emergency department--a way to improve it. J Accid Emerg Med 1997, 14:299-301. discussion 302-293
• [35]Grogan EL, Stiles RA, France DJ, Speroff T, Morris JJA, Nixon B, Gaffney FA, Seddon R, Pinson CW: The impact of aviation-based teamwork training on the attitudes of health-care professionals. J Am Coll Surgeons 2004, 199:843-848.
• [36]Siassakos D, Crofts JF, Winter C, Weiner CP, Draycott TJ: The active components of effective training in obstetric emergencies. BJOG 2009, 116:1028-1032.