期刊论文详细信息
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
The efficacy of molecular subtyping in predicting postoperative recurrence in breast-conserving therapy: a 15-study meta-analysis
Shui Wang3  Hong-yong Cao1  Chong-yin Tang2  Bin Zhang2  Mu-hong Guo2  Yang Xu4  Jia-yi Zhang4  Han-jin Wang2  Peng Jiang2  Jing Chen2 
[1] Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China;Department of General Surgery of Breast and Thyroid, Nanjing Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China;Department of Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China;Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
关键词: Meta-analysis;    Recurrence;    Breast-conserving therapy;    Molecular subtypes;    Breast cancer;   
Others  :  1148765
DOI  :  10.1186/1477-7819-12-212
 received in 2014-02-21, accepted in 2014-07-04,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Recent research displays that breast cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous disease and distinct molecular subtypes yield different prognostic outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a meta-analysis to clarify the role of molecular subtypes in recurrence risk after breast-conserving therapy (BCT). Eligible studies of single- (ER, PR, Her-2, and p53) and triple-molecular (Luminal A, Luminal B, Her-2, triple-negative) subtypes were identified through multiple search strategies. Pooled hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated to assess this research topic.

Results

Fifteen studies involving 21,645 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Her-2 positive patients had a significantly higher recurrence risk in both overall merge (HR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.41-2.75) and subtotal merge of local recurrence (LR) (HR = 1.93, 95% CI: 1.34-2.78). Significantly higher risk of recurrence was also observed in p53 positive patients by overall merge (HR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.49 -2.12) and subtotal merge of LR (HR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.44-2.07). When setting Luminal A as a baseline, Luminal B, Her-2, and triple-negative all showed significantly increased risk for both LR and distant recurrence (DR). Comparing triple-negative and non-triple-negative subtypes showed the biggest risk for overall recurrence (HR = 3.19, 95% CI: 1.91-5.31) and LR (HR = 3.31, 95% CI: 1.69-6.45).

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis showed significant differences in recurrence risk among various molecular subtypes after BCT. Although Her-2 and p53 positive subtypes can be considered independent prognostic biomarkers for indicating high LR risk, triple-molecular biomarkers showed higher clinical value. Triple-negative subtype showed the highest recurrence risk among all subtypes, and adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered for it.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Chen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150404202429823.pdf 720KB PDF download
Figure 3. 62KB Image download
Figure 2. 58KB Image download
Figure 1. 94KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Bartelink H, Horiot JC, Poortmans PM, Struikmans H, Van den Bogaert W, Fourquet A, Jager JJ, Hoogenraad WJ, Oei SB, Wárlám-Rodenhuis CC, Pierart M, Collette L: Impact of a higher radiation dose on local control and survival in breast-conserving therapy of early breast cancer: 10-year results of the randomized boost versus no boost EORTC 22881-10882 trial. J Clin Oncol 2007, 25:3259-3265.
  • [2]Clark RM, Whelan T, Levine M, Roberts R, Willan A, McCulloch P, Lipa M, Wilkinson RH, Mahoney LJ: Randomized clinical trial of breast irradiation following lumpectomy and axillary dissection for node-negative breast cancer: an update. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996, 88:1659-1664.
  • [3]Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, Jeong JH, Wolmark N: Twenty-year follow-up of randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002, 347:1233-1241.
  • [4]Freedman GM, Anderson PR, Hanlon AL, Eisenberg DF, Nicolaou N: Pattern of local recurrence after conservative surgery and whole-breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005, 61:1328-1336.
  • [5]Anderson SJ, Wapnir I, Dignam JJ, Fisher B, Mamounas EP, Jeong JH, Geyer CE Jr, Wickerham DL, Costantino JP, Wolmark N: Prognosis after ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and locoregional recurrences in patients treated by breast-conserving therapy in five National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocols of node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009, 27:2466-2473.
  • [6]Veronesi U, Marubini E, Del Vecchio M, Manzari A, Andreola S, Greco M, Luini A, Merson M, Saccozzi R, Rilke F: Local recurrences and distant metastases after conservative breast cancer treatments: partly independent events. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995, 87:19-27.
  • [7]Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, Greco M, Saccozzi R, Luini A, Aguilar M, Marubini E: Twenty year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breastconserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002, 347:1227-1232.
  • [8]Jacobson JA, Danforth DN, Cowan KH, d’Angelo T, Steinberg SM, Pierce L, Lippman ME, Lichter AS, Glatstein E, Okunieff P: Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1995, 332:907-911.
  • [9]Blichert-Toft M, Rose C, Andersen JA, Overgaard M, Axelsson CK, Andersen KW, Mouridsen HT: Danish randomized trial comparing breast conservation therapy with mastectomy: Six years of life-table analysis—Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1992, 11:19-25.
  • [10]van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, Legrand C, Sylvester RJ, Tong D, van der Schueren E, Helle PA, van Zijl K, Bartelink H: Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000, 92(14):1143-1150.
  • [11]Fisher B, Bryant J, Dignam JJ, Wickerham DL, Mamounas EP, Fisher ER, Margolese RG, Nesbitt L, Paik S, Pisansky TM, Wolmark N: Tamoxifen, radiation therapy, or both for prevention of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after lumpectomy in women with invasive breast cancers of one centimeter or less. J Clin Oncol 2002, 20:4141-4149.
  • [12]Perou CM, Sørlie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Rees CA, Pollack JR, Ross DT, Johnsen H, Akslen LA, Fluge O, Pergamenschikov A, Williams C, Zhu SX, Lønning PE, Børresen-Dale AL, Brown PO, Botstein D: Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 2000, 406:747-752.
  • [13]Konecny GE: Impact of molecular breast cancer portraits on new treatment strategies for gynecologic malignancies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2013, 25(1):38-39.
  • [14]Sørlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, Aas T, Geisler S, Johnsen H, Hastie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Thorsen T, Quist H, Matese JC, Brown PO, Botstein D, Lønning PE, Børresen-Dale AL: Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001, 98:10869-10874.
  • [15]Oh DS, Troester MA, Usary J, Hu Z, He X, Fan C, Wu J, Carey LA, Perou CM: Estrogenregulated genes predict survival in hormone receptorpositive breast cancers. J Clin Oncol 2006, 24:1656-1664.
  • [16]Rouzier R, Perou CM, Symmans WF, Ibrahim N, Cristofanilli M, Anderson K, Hess KR, Stec J, Ayers M, Wagner P, Morandi P, Fan C, Rabiul I, Ross JS, Hortobagyi GN, Pusztai L: Breast cancer molecular subtypes respond differently to preoperative chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 2005, 11:5678-5685.
  • [17]Nguyen PL, Taghian AG, Katz MS, Niemierko A, Abi Raad RF, Boon WL, Bellon JR, Wong JS, Smith BL, Harris JR: Breast cancer subtype approximated by estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER-2 is associated with local and distant recurrence after breast conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol 2008, 26:2373-2378.
  • [18]Albert JM, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Guray M, Sahin A, Strom EA, Tereffe W, Woodward WA, Tucker SL, Hunt KK, Hortobagyi GN, Buchholz TA: Estrogen/progesterone receptor negativity and HER2 positivity predict locoregional recurrence in patients with T1a, bN0 breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010, 77:1296-1302.
  • [19]Voduc KD, Cheang MCU, Tyldesley S, Gelmon K, Nielsen TO, Kennecke H: Breast cancer subtypes and the risk of local and regional relapse. J Clin Oncol 2010, 28:1684-1691.
  • [20]Tang P, Skinner KA, Hicks DG: Molecular classification of breast carcinomas by immunohistochemical analysis: Are we ready? Diagn Mol Pathol 2009, 18:125-132.
  • [21]Tamaki K, Ishida T, Miyashita M, Amari M, Mori N, Ohuchi N, Tamaki N, Sasano H: Multidetector row helical computed tomography for invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: correlation between radiological findings and the corresponding biological characteristics of patients. Cancer Sci 2012, 103:67-72.
  • [22]Tamaki K, Sasano H, Ishida T, Miyashita M, Takeda M, Amari M, Tamaki N, Ohuchi N: The comparison of core needle biopsy (CNB) and surgical specimens for accurate preoperative evaluation of ER, PgR and HER2 status of breast cancer patients. Cancer Sci 2010, 101:2074-2079.
  • [23]Tamaki K, Ishida T, Miyashita M, Amari M, Ohuchi N, Tamaki N, Sasano H: Correlation between mammographic findings and corresponding histopathology: potential predictors for biological characteristics of breast diseases. Cancer Sci 2011, 102:2179-2185.
  • [24]Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB: Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: aproposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000, 283:2008-2012.
  • [25]Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D, Burdett S, Sydes MR: Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into metaanalysis. Trials 2007, 8:16.
  • [26]Parmar MK, Torri V, Stewart L: Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Stat Med 1998, 17:2815-2834.
  • [27]Williamson PR, Smith CT, Hutton JL, Marson AG: Aggregate data meta-analysis with time-to-event outcomes. Stat Med 2002, 21:3337-3351.
  • [28]DerSimonian R, Laird N: Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986, 7:177-188.
  • [29]Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C: Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997, 315:629-634.
  • [30]Hattangadi-Gluth JA, Wo JY, Nguyen PL, Abi Raad RF, Sreedhara M, Niemierko A, Freer PE, Georgian-Smith D, Bellon JR, Wong JS, Smith BL, Harris JR, Taghian AG: Basal subtype of invasive breast cancer is associated with a higher risk of true recurrence after conventionalbreast-conserving therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012, 82:1185-1191.
  • [31]Zauls AJ, Watkins JM, Wahlquist AE, Brackett NC 3rd, Aguero EG, Baker MK, Jenrette JM, Garrett-Mayer E, Harper JL: Outcomes in women treated with MammoSite brachytherapy or whole breast irradiation stratified by ASTRO Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Consensus Statement Groups. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012, 82:21-29.
  • [32]Han K, Nofech-Mozes S, Narod S, Hanna W, Vesprini D, Saskin R, Taylor C, Kong I, Paszat L, Rakovitch E: Expression of HER2neu in ductal carcinoma in situ is associated with local recurrence. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2012, 24:183-189.
  • [33]Millar EK, Graham PH, McNeil CM, Browne L, O’Toole SA, Boulghourjian A, Kearsley JH, Papadatos G, Delaney G, Fox C, Nasser E, Capp A, Sutherland RL: Prediction of outcome of early ER+ breast cancer is improved using a biomarker panel, which includes Ki-67 and p53. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012, 134:683-692.
  • [34]Moran MS, Yang Q, Goyal S, Harris L, Chung G, Haffty BG: Evaluation of vascular endothelial growth factor as a prognostic marker for local relapse in early-stage breastcancer patients treated with breast-conserving therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011, 81:1236-1243.
  • [35]Wong FY, Chin FK, Lee KA, Soong YL, Chua ET: Hormone receptors and HER-2 status as surrogates for breast cancer molecular subtypes prognosticate for disease control in node negative Asian patients treated with breast conservation therapy. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2011, 40:90-96.
  • [36]Kim HJ, Han W, Yi OV, Shin HC, Ahn SK, Koh BS, Moon HG, You JH, Son BH, Ahn SH, Noh DY: Young age is associated with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast conserving surgery and radiation therapy in patients with HER2-positive/ER-negative subtype. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011, 130:499-505.
  • [37]Bantema-Joppe EJ, van der Laan HP, de Bock GH, Wijsman R, Dolsma WV, Busz DM, Langendijk JA, Maduro JH: Three-dimensional conformal hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost in breast conserving therapy: results on local control and survival. Radiother Oncol 2011, 100:215-220.
  • [38]Arvold ND, Taghian AG, Niemierko A, Abi Raad RF, Sreedhara M, Nguyen PL, Bellon JR, Wong JS, Smith BL, Harris JR: Age, breast cancer subtype approximation, and local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol 2011, 29:3885-3891.
  • [39]Truong PT, Jones SO, Kader HA, Wai ES, Speers CH, Alexander AS, Olivotto IA: Patients with t1 to t2 breast cancer with one to three positive nodes have higher local and regional recurrence risks compared with node-negative patients after breast-conserving surgery and whole-breast radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009, 73:357-364.
  • [40]Nofech-Mozes S, Spayne J, Rakovitch E, Kahn HJ, Seth A, Pignol JP, Lickley L, Paszat L, Hanna W: Biological markers predictive of invasive recurrence in DCIS. Clin Med Oncol 2008, 2:7-18.
  • [41]de Roos MA, van der Vegt B, Peterse JL, Patriarca C, de Vries J, de Bock GH, Wesseling J: The expression pattern of MUC1 (EMA) is related to tumour characteristics and clinical outcome in ‘pure’ ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Histopathology 2007, 51:227-238.
  • [42]Yau TK, Soong IS, Chan K, Chan M, Cheung P, Lau HW, Chang AT, Lee AW: Clinical outcome of breast conservation therapy for breast cancer in Hong Kong: prognostic impact of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and 2005 St. Gallen risk categories. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007, 68:667-672.
  • [43]Smith BD, Gross CP, Smith GL, Galusha DH, Bekelman JE, Haffty BG: Effectiveness of radiation therapy for older women with early breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006, 98:681-690.
  • [44]Silvestrini R, Veneroni S, Benini E, Daidone MG, Luisi A, Leutner M, Maucione A, Kenda R, Zucali R, Veronesi U: Expression of p53, glutathione S-transferase-pi, and Bcl-2 proteins and benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy inbreast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997, 89:639-645.
  • [45]Brenton JD, Carey LA, Ahmed AA, Caldas C: Molecular classification and molecular forecasting of breast cancer: ready for clinical application? J Clin Oncol 2005, 23:7350-7360.
  • [46]Althuis MD, Dozier JM, Anderson WF, Devesa SS, Brinton LA: Global trends in breast cancer incidence and mortality 1973-1997. Int J Epidemiol 2005, 34:405-412.
  • [47]Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM: Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 2010, 127:2893-2917.
  • [48]Hou N, Huo D: A trend analysis of breast cancer incidence rates in the United States from 2000 to 2009 shows a recent increase. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013, 138:633-641.
  • [49]No authors listed: Advanced breast cancers increasing in young women. BMJ 2013, 346:f1234.
  • [50]Forrest AP, Stewart HJ, Everington D, Prescott RJ, McArdle CS, Harnett AN, Smith DC, George WD: Randomised controlled trial of conservation therapy for breast cancer: 6-years analysis of the Scottish trial. Lancet 1996, 348:708-713.
  • [51]Liljegren G, Holmberg L, Bergh J, Lindgren A, Tabár L, Nordgren H, Adami HO: 10-year results after sector resection with or without postoperative radiotherapy for stage I breast cancer: A randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 1999, 17:2326-2333.
  • [52]White J: Do we need to irradiate all small invasive breast cancers and DCIS? Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2013, 2013:40-44.
  • [53]Wo JY, Taghian AG, Nguyen PL, Raad RA, Sreedhara M, Bellon JR, Wong JS, Gadd MA, Smith BL, Harris JR: The association between biological subtype and isolated regional nodal failure after breast-conserving therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010, 77:188-196.
  • [54]Thompson AM, Lane DP: p53 transcriptional pathways in breast cancer: the good, the bad and the complex. J Pathol 2010, 220:401-403.
  • [55]Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Thürlimann B, Senn HJ, Panel members: Strategies for subtypes–dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Ann Oncol 2011, 22:1736-1747.
  • [56]Bauer KR, Brown M, Cress RD, Parise CA, Caggiano V: Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from the California cancer Registry. Cancer 2007, 109:1721-1728.
  • [57]Andreu FJ: Histologic diagnosis in young women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010, 123:15-18.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:12次 浏览次数:42次