Triage systems for pre-hospital emergency medical services - a systematic review

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine

Gunn Elisabeth Vist¹  Hilde H Holte¹  Ingeborg Beate Lidal¹ 

[1] The Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, St. Olavs plass, Po Box 7004, OSLO, 0130, Norway

关键词: Effect;    Emergencies;    Controlled trials;    Emergency medical services;    Pre-hospital;    Triage system;    Triage;   

Others  :  826016
DOI  :  10.1186/1757-7241-21-28

 received in 2012-09-28, accepted in 2013-03-24,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

The emergency medical services (EMS) cover initiatives and services established to provide essential medical assistance in situations of acute illness. Triage-methods for systematic prioritizing of patients according to how urgent patients need care, including triage of requests of acute medical treatment, are adopted in hospitals as well as in the pre-hospital settings. This systematic review searched to identify available research on the effects of validated triage systems for use in the pre-hospital EMS on health outcomes, patient safety, patient satisfaction, user-friendliness, resource use, goal achievement, and the quality on the information exchange between the different settings of the EMS (for example the quality of documentation). The specific research questions were: 1) are pre-hospital triage systems effective, 2) is one triage system more effective than others, and 3) is it effective to use the same triage system in two or more settings of the EMS-chain? We conducted a systematic literature search in nine databases up to June 2012. We searched for systematic reviews (SRs), randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized controlled trials (non-RCTs), controlled before and after studies (CBAs) and interrupted time series analyses (ITSs). Two persons independently reviewed titles and abstracts, and the same persons read all possibly relevant full text articles and rated the methodological quality where relevant. The literature search identified 11011 unique references. A total of 120 publications were read in full text. None of the identified articles fulfilled our inclusion criteria, thus our question on the effects of pre-hospital triage systems, if one system is better than other systems, and the question on effects of using the same triage system in two or more settings of the EMS, remain unanswered. We conclude that there is an evidence gap regarding the effects of pre-hospital triage systems and the effects of using the same triage system in two or more settings of the EMS. The finding does not mean that pre-hospital triage systems are ineffective, but that we lack knowledge about potential effects. When introducing a new assessment tool in the EMS, it is timely to conduct well-planned studies aimed to assess the effect.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Lidal et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Farrohknia N, Castrén M, Lind AEL, Oredsson S, Jonsson H, Asplund K: Emergency department triage scales and their components: A systematic review of the scientific evidence. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2011, 19(42):1-13.
• [2]Christ M, Grossmann F, Winter D, Bingisser R, Platz E: Modern triage in the emergency department. Deutsches Arzteblatt International. Arztebl 2010, 107(50):892-898.
• [3]Hansen EH, Hunskaar S: Differences in requests to out-of-hours services in Norway. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2007, 127:1344-1346.
• [4]Lindberg SO, la Lerche CJ, Folkestad L, Hallas P, Brabrand M: The use of triage in Danish emergency departments. Dan Med Bull 2011, 58(10):A4301.
• [5]Carrasqueiro S, Oliviera M, Encarnacão P: Evaluation of telephone triage and advice services: a systematic review on methods, metrics and results. Stud Health Technol Inform 2011, 169:407-411.
• [6]Huibers L, Smits M, Renaud V, Giesen P, Wensing M: Safety of telephone triage in out-of-hours care: a systematic review. Scand J Prim Health Care 2011, 29(4):198-209.
• [7]Widgren BR, Jourak M: Medical Emergency Triage and Treatment System (METTS): A new protocol in primary triage and secondary priority decision in emergency medicine. J Emerg Med 2011, 40:623-628.
• [8]METTS-Pre. Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset. Available from: http://ebookbrowse.com/gdoc.php?id=369647171&url=c1553c872ce92cf888557a17fbfe092f webcite
• [9]Goransson K, Ehrenberg A, Ehnfors M: Triage in emergency departments: national survey. J Clinical Nursing 2005, 14(9):74.
• [10]Farrohknia N, Göransson KE: Swedish emergency department triage and interventions for improved patietn flows: a national update. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2011, 19(72):1-5.
• [11]Nordberg M, Lethvall S, Castrén M: The validity of the triage system ADAPT. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2010, 18(Suppl 1):36. BioMed Central Full Text
• [12]SBU: Triage och flödesprocesser på akutmottagningen - En systematisk litteraturöversikt. 2010. Available from: http://www.sbu.se/upload/Publikationer/Content0/1/Triage_fulltext.pdf webcite
• [13]Harding KE, Taylor NF, Leggat SG: Do triage systems in healthcare improve patient flow? A systematic review of the literature. Aust Health Rev 2011, 35(3):371-383.
• [14]Moen S: The implementation of METTS triagesystem in the ambulance services in Sør-Trøndelag (Conference presentation in Norwegian). Skandinavisk akuttmedisin 2011. Available from: http://www.google.no/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=9&cad=rja&ved=0CFkQFjAI&url=http%3A%2F%2Fakuttmedisin2011.org%2Fforedrag_pdf%2F2Sesjon_B1_Siv_Moen.pdf&ei=1B9cUMzPLO6N4gT9yICYBQ&usg=AFQjCNEarE-QtfvC4PWU69F768gxYju9Rw&sig2=cNN9NGnESQyUp7TcbTWJ8Q webcite
• [15]Lidal I, Holte HH, Gundersen MW: Triagesystems for emergency medical services - pre-hospital and at hospital admission (Systematic review in Norwegian). The Norwegian Knowledge Centre; Available from: http://www.kunnskapssenteret.no/Publikasjoner/_attachment/14169?_ts=134562af5a3&download=true webcite
• [16]Nasjonalt kunnskapssenter for helsetjenesten: Slik oppsummerer vi forskning. Nasjonalt kunnskapssenter for helsetjenesten; Available from: http://www.kunnskapssenteret.no/Verkt%C3%B8y/_attachment/17999?_ts=13d8cd408fc&download=true webcite
• [17]RevMan: The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from: http://ims.cochrane.org/revman webcite
• [18]GRADE working group: Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). GRADE working group; Available from: http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/ webcite
• [19]Kilner TM, Brace SJ, Cooke MW, Stallard N, Bleetman A, Perkins GD: In ‘big bang’ major incidents do triage tools accurately predict clinical priority?: A systematic review of the literature. Injury 2011, 42(5):460-468.
• [20]The cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions The Cochrane CollaborationAvailable from: http://www.cochrane-handbook.org/ webcite
• [21]Sanders AB: Cardiac arrest and the limitations of clinical trials. The New England journal of medicine 2011, 365(9):850-851.
• [22]Ortolani P, Marzocchi A, Marrozzini C, Palmerini T, Saia F, Baldazzi F, et al.: Usefulness of prehospital triage in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2007, 100(5):787-792.
• [23]Oredsson S, Jonsson H, Rognes J, Lind L, Göransson KE, Ehrenberg A, et al.: A systematic review of triage-related interventions to improve patient flow in emergency departments. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2011, 19(43):1-9.