Host adapted intramammary infections in pregnant heifers which were co-housed and reared on fresh milk as calves

BMC Veterinary Research

Renette Badenhorst²  Johanna C Watermeyer²  Maia Lesosky¹  Joanne Karzis²  Inge-Marié Petzer² 

[1] Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Observatory, Cape Town, 7925, South Africa;Department of Production Animal Studies, Section Udder Health, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X04, Onderstepoort, 0110, South Africa

关键词: Fresh milk rearing systems;    Co-housed calves;    Streptococcus agalactiae;    Staphylococcus aureus;    Heifer intramammary infections;   

Others  :  1119589
DOI  :  10.1186/1746-6148-9-49

 received in 2012-04-25, accepted in 2013-03-04,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Heifers can calve down with intramammary infections (IMI) and udder damage. This will have a negative impact on their longevity, future milk yield and financial return. Co-housed pre-weaned calves that are fed fresh milk have the opportunity to suckle each other’s teats and may infect udders of fellow heifer calves with pathogens present in milk. The prevalence of IMI in pregnant heifers in South Africa (SA) which were co-housed and reared on fresh milk as calves, is not known. Quarter secretion samples from both pregnant heifers (n = 2065) and dry cows (n = 5365) were collected for microbiological analysis from eight SA dairy herds. All heifers tested in this study were co-housed pre-weaning and were fed fresh milk as calves.

Results

The prevalence of coagulase negative staphylococci, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae, environmental streptococci, coliforms and samples with no bacterial growth in heifers was 26%, 0.9%, 0.08%, 1.4%, 0.4% and 66%, respectively. The overall prevalence ratio between heifers and cows for Staphylococcus aureus IMI was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.59, 0.98). Four of the individual herds had prevalence ratios of less than one (p < 0.05), one herd had a prevalence ratio of 3.15 (95% CI: 1.52, 6.32), and the remaining 3 herds had a prevalence ratio not significantly different from 1.0. Marginally significant differences were found between Staphylococcus aureus IMI in pregnant heifers compared to cows in their second and later lactations (p = 0.06, p = 0.05, respectively) but no significant differences between heifers and cows in their first lactation.

Conclusions

The presence of Streptococcus agalactiae IMI in heifers came as a surprise, especially as herd infection rates were low. The high prevalence ratio of Staphylococcus aureus between heifers and cows in one herd warrants further investigation due to the potential danger of udder damage in a young cow at the start of her productive life. The IMI in heifers with host adapted pathogens can also act as a source of new IMI for lactating dairy cows.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Petzer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Smith KL, Hogan SJ: The World of Mastitis. In Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Mastitis and Milk Quality. Vancouver, Canada; 2001:13.
• [2]Hogeveen H, Pyorala S, Persson Waller K, Hogan JS, Lam TJGM, Oliver SP, Schukken YH, Barkema HW, Hillerton JE: Current status and future challenges in mastitis research. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the National Mastitis Council. USA; 2011.
• [3]Woolford MH, Williamson JH, Day AM, Copeman PJA: An identical twin study of milk production losses due to subclinical mastitis. In Proceedings of the Ruakura Farmers’Conference, Ruakura. New Zealand; 1983.
• [4]Compton C, Heurer WR, Parker K, Mcdougall S: Risk factors for peripartum mastitis in pasture-grazed heifers. J Dairy Sci 2007, 90:4171-4180.
• [5]Drew B: Targets for rearing dairy heifers – weaning to calving. In Pract 1998, 20:35-39.
• [6]Dellmeier GR, Friend TH, Gbur EE: Comparison of four methods of calf confinement II. Behav J Anim Sci 1985, 60:1102-1109.
• [7]Perez E, Noordhuizen JPTM, Van Wuikhuise LA, Stassen EN: Management factors related to calf morbidity and mortality rates. Livest Prod Sci 1990, 25:79-93.
• [8]Trinidad P, Nickerson SC, Alley TK: Efficacy of intramammary treatment in unbred and primigravid dairy heifers. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1990, 197:107-114.
• [9]Radostits OM, Leslie KE, Fetrow J: Herd health: Food animal production medicine. 2nd edition. USA: WB Saunders; 1994.
• [10]Svensson C, Emanuelsson U, Pettersson K: Health status of dairy calves kept in individual pens or in group pens with or without automatic milk feeder. In Proceedings of Xth International Congress of Animal Hygiene, Maastricht. The Netherlands; 2000:426-430.
• [11]Oliver SP, Gillepsie EB, Headrick SJ, Dowlen HH, Lewis MJ: Prevalence, risk factors, and strategies for controlling mastitis in heifers during the periparturient period. Int J Appl Res Vet Med 2005, 3(2):150-162.
• [12]Giesecke WH, Du Preez JH, Petzer IM: Practical mastitis control in Dairy Herds. Butterworths; 1994.
• [13]Schalm OW: Streptococcus agalactiae in the udders of heifers at parturition traced to suckle among calves. Cornell Vet 1942, 32:49-60.
• [14]Waage S, Sviland S, Ødegaand SA: Identification of risk factors for clinical mastitis in dairy heifers. J Dairy Sci 1998, 81(5):1275-1284.
• [15]Gonzalez-Sedano M, Marin-Mejia B, Maranto MI, Leme De Magalhaes-Labarthe AC, Alonso-Dias MA: Effect of residual calf suckling on clinical and sub-clinical infections of mastitis in dual-purpose cows: epidemiological measurements. Res Vet Sci 2010, 89(3):362-366.
• [16]Trinidad P, Nickerson SC, Alley TK: Prevalence of intramammary infection and teat canal colonization in unbred and primigravid dairy heifers. J Dairy Sci 1990, 73:107-114.
• [17]Ruegg PL: Heifer Mastitis – How to Help Heifers Calve Clean. In Proceeding of Dairy Calf & Heifer Conference. Lake Geneva; 2011:5-6.
• [18]Fox LK, Chester ST, Hallberg JW, Nickerson SC, Pankey JW, Weaver LD: Survey of intramammary infections in dairy heifers at breeding age and first parturition. J Dairy Sci 1995, 78:1619-1628.
• [19]Myllys V: Staphylococci in heifer mastitis before and after parturition. J Dairy Res 1995, 62(1):51-60.
• [20]Oliver SP, Mitchell BA: Susceptibility of bovine mammary gland to infections during the dry period. J Dairy Sci 1983, 66:1162-1166.
• [21]Oliver SP, Lewis MJ, Gillespie BE, Dowlen HH, Janicke EC, Robers RK: Milk production, milk quality and economics benefit associated with prepartum antibiotic treatment of heifers. J Diary Sci 2003, 86:1187-1193.
• [22]Nickerson SC: Control of heifer mastitis: antimicrobial treatment – an overview. Vet Microbiol 2009, 134:128-135.
• [23]Roberson JR, Fox LK, Hancock DD, Gay JM, Besser TE: Sources of intramammary infections from Staphylococcus aureus in dairy heifers at first parturition. J Dairy Sci 1998, 81:687-693.
• [24]Barkema HW, Schukken YH, Lam TJ, Beiboer ML, Benedictus G, Brand A: Management practices associated with the incidence rate of clinical mastitis. J Dairy Sci 1999, 82:1643-1654.
• [25]Nickerson SC, Owens WE, Boddie RL: Mastitis in dairy heifers: initial studies on prevalence and control. J Dairy Sci 1995, 78:1607-1618.
• [26]Fox LK: Prevalence, incidence and risk factors of heifer mastitis. Vet Microbiol 2009, 134:82-88.
• [27]Owens WE, Nickerson NC, Boddie RL, Tomita GM, Ray CH: Prevalence of mastitis in dairy heifers and effectiveness of antibiotic therapy. J Dairy Sci 2001, 84:814-817.
• [28]Sampimon OC, de Vliegher S, Barkema HW, Sol J, Lam TJGM: Effect of prepartum dry cow antibiotic treatment in dairy heifers on udder health and milk production. J Dairy Sci 2009, 92:4395-4403.
• [29]Middleton JR, Timms LL, Bader R, Lakritz J, Luby CD, Steevens BJ: Effect of prepartum intramammary treatment with pirlimycin hydrochloride on prevalence of early first-lactation mastitis in dairy heifers. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005, 27:1969-1974.
• [30]McDougall S, Parker K, Compton C, Heuer C: Reducing subclinical and clinical mastitis in dairy heifers by precalving infusion of a teat sealant and/or parenteral antibiotic therapy. In Proceedings of the 4th International Dairy Federation International Mastitis Conference Maastricht. The Netherlands; 2005:269-273.
• [31]Pettersson K, Svensson C, Liberg P: Housing, feeding and management of calves and replacement heifers in Swedish dairy herds. Acta Vet Scand 2001, 42(4):465-478. BioMed Central Full Text
• [32]Sandholm M, Honkanen-Buzalski T, Kaartinen L, Pyörälä S: The Bovine Udder and Mastitis. Helsinki: University of Helsinki Faculty of Veterinary medicine; 1995.
• [33]Karzis J: Intramammary antibiotics in dairy goats: Withdrawal periods and tissue tolerance. University of Pretoria: Dept. of Production Animal Studies; 2005. [MSc Thesis]
• [34]Milk Sample Diagnostic Programme. Pretoria, South Africa: Abaci Systems; 1999.
• [35]R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. R Core Team (2012). URL [http://www.R-project.org/ webcite]
• [36]Rothman KJ: Epidemiology an introduction. London: Oxford University Press; 2002:130-143.
• [37]McCullagh P, Nelder JA: Generalized Linear Models. 2nd edition. London: Chapman and Hall; 1989.