A prospective study on a cohort of horses and ponies selected for participation in the European Eventing Championship: reasons for withdrawal and predictive value of fitness tests

BMC Veterinary Research

Marianne M Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan¹  René van Weeren¹  Emile Welling³  Jan van den Broek⁴  Carolien C B M Munsters² 

[1] Department of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 114, 3584 CM Utrecht, the Netherlands;Moxie Sport Analysis & Coaching, Raam 107, 5403 TH Uden, the Netherlands;Dutch National Equestrian Federation, de Beek 125, 3852 PL Ermelo, the Netherlands;Department of Farm Animal Health, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 7, 3584 CL Utrecht, the Netherlands

关键词: Training;    Monitoring;    Fitness;    Exercise;    Eventing;    Horse;   

Others  :  1119456
DOI  :  10.1186/1746-6148-9-182

 received in 2012-12-03, accepted in 2013-09-03,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Eventing is generally recognized as a challenging equestrian discipline and wastage figures for this discipline are relatively high. There is a need for information that provides insight into the causes of wastage and withdrawal from competition, for animal welfare and economic reasons. The aim of the present investigation was to conduct a prospective study following the entire national selection of event horses (n = 20) and ponies (n = 9) in the Netherlands that prepared for the European Championship in 2010 (ponies) and 2011 (horses), noting causes of withdrawal and monitoring fitness using standardized exercise tests (SETs), with heart rate (HR; beats/min), speed (V; m/s) and plasma lactate concentrations (LA; mmol/L) as measured parameters.

Results

In SET-I, performed at the beginning of the season, horses (n = 17) had a mean V_LA4 (V at LA 4 mmol/L) of 10.3 ± 0.4 m/s with a mean V₂₀₀ (V at 200 beats/min) of 11.4 ± 0.8 m/s and ponies (n = 9) a mean V_LA4 of 7.8 ± 0.9 m/s and V₂₀₀ of 9.6 ± 0.7 m/s. Before SET-II, performed six weeks before the European Championship, 16/20 horses and 6/9 ponies were withdrawn. The most common reason for withdrawal was locomotor injury (9/16 horses, 4/6 ponies; P < 0.001 and P = 0.011, respectively). Other reasons included an animal ‘not meeting the competition criteria’ (4/16 horses, 2/6 ponies) and being sold (3/16 horses). Animals were divided on the basis of V_LA4 and recovery-HR during SET-I into good and average performers. Average performers were significantly more likely to be injured (50.0%) than good performers (0%, P = 0.05). In a subpopulation of ten horses, in which all condition training sessions were evaluated for HR and speed, HR_peak was significantly lower in horses that stayed sound (186 ± 9 beats/min) compared with horses withdrawn from training and competition because of injury (201 ± 5 beats/min; P = 0.016).

Conclusions

Of the national selection, 45% of all animals were unavailable for the European Championship because of locomotor injuries. Field tests were useful in assessing the potential injury risk, as individuals with better fitness indices (good performers) were less likely to become injured than average performers. Furthermore, monitoring of training sessions showed predictive value for future injuries, as horses withdrawn because of injury later on showed already higher peak HRs during condition training than horses that stayed sound. Therefore the increase in peak HR seemed to precede visible lameness in a horse.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Munsters et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]O’Brien E, Stevens KB, Pfeiffer DU, Hall J, Marr CM: Factors associated with the wastage and achievements in competition of event horses registered in the United Kingdom. Vet Rec 2005, 157:9-13.
• [2]Singer ER, Barnes J, Saxby F, Murray JK: Injuries in event horses: Training versus competition. Vet J 2008, 175:76-81.
• [3]Amory H, Art T, Linden A, Desmecht D, Buchet M, Lekeux P: Physiological response to the cross-country phase in eventing horses. J Equine Vet Sci 1993, 13(11):646-650.
• [4]Bitschnau B, Wiestner T, Trachsel DS, Auer JA, Weishaupt MA: Performance parameters and post-exercise heart-rate recovery in Warmblood sport horses of different performance levels. Equine Vet J 2010, 42(Suppl 38):17-22.
• [5]De Moffarts B, Kirschvink N, Van Erck E, Art T, Pincemail J, Lekeux P: Assessment of the oxidant-antioxidant blood balance in a field exercise test in Standardbred and eventing horses. Equine Comp Exerc Physiol 2005, 2(4):253-261.
• [6]Muñoz A, Riber C, Santisteban R, Vivo R, Agüera EI, Castejón FM: Investigation of standardized exercise tests according to fitness level for three-day event horses. J Equine Sci 1998, 9(1):1-7.
• [7]Marlin DJ, Harris PA, Schroter RC, Harris RC, Roberts CA, Scott CM, Orme CE, Dunnett SJD, Barrelet F, Williams B, Marr CM, Casas I: Physiological, metabolic and biochemical responses of horses competing in the speed and endurance phase of a CCI**** 3-day event. Equine Vet J 1995, 27(Suppl 20):37-46.
• [8]White SL, Williamson LH, Maykuth PL, Cole SP, Andrews FM: Heart rate response and plasma lactate concentrations of horses competing in the speed and endurance phase of 3-day combined training events. Equine Vet J 1995, 27(Suppl 20):52-56.
• [9]White SL, Williamson LH, Maykuth PL, Cole SP, Andrews FM: Heart rate and lactate concentration during two different cross country events. Equine Vet J 1995, 27(Suppl 18):463-467.
• [10]Muñoz A, Riber C, Santisteban R, Rubio MD, Agüera EI, Castejón FM: Cardiovascular and metabolic adaptations in horses competing in cross-country. J Vet Med Sci 1999, 61(1):13-20.
• [11]Katz LM, Bayly WM, Hines MT, Sides RH: Ventilatory responses of ponies and horses to exercise. Equine Comp Exerc Physiol 2005, 2(4):229-240.
• [12]Sloet Van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM, Barneveld A, Wensing TH, Breukink HJ: The effects of training and detraining in ponies. Equine Athlete 1993, 6(2):16-20.
• [13]Couroucé A: Field exercise testing for assessing fitness in French Standardbred trotters. Vet J 1999, 157:112-122.
• [14]Couroucé A, Chatard JC, Auvinet B: Estimation of performance potential of Standardbred trotters from blood lactate concentrations measured in field conditions. Equine Vet J 1997, 29(5):365-369.
• [15]Erickson BK, Erickson HH, Sexton WL, Coffman JR: Performance evaluation and detection of injury during exercise training in the quarter horse using a heart rate computer. Equine Exerc Physiol II: ICEEP Publications, Davies, California; 1987:92-101.
• [16]Von Elm E, Althman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP: STROBE Initiative: the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE)statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med 2007, 4(10):e296.
• [17]Kingston JK, Soppet GM, Rogers CW, Firth EC: Use of a global positioning and heart rate monitoring system to assess training load in a group of thoroughbred racehorses. Equine Vet J 2006, 38(Suppl 36):106-109.
• [18]Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM, Van den Hoven R, Breukink HJ: The accuracy of three different heart rate meters used for studies in the exercising horse. J Vet Med A 1988, 35:665-672.
• [19]Sloet Van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM, Van den Broek ETW, Spierenburg AJ: Evaluation of the usefulness of the portable device Lactate Pro for measurements of lactate concentrations in equine whole blood. J Vet Diagnos Invest 2008, 20:83-85.
• [20]van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM S, Wensing TH, Breukink HJ: Standardised exercise test on a track to evaluate fitness and training of saddle horses. In Equine Exerc Physiol II. Davies, California: ICEEP Publications; 1987:68-76.
• [21]Katz LM, Bayly WM, Hines MT, Sides RH: Differences in the ventilatory responses of horses and ponies to exercise of varying intensities. Equine Vet J 1999, 31(Suppl 31):49-51.
• [22]Katz LM, Bayly WM, Roeder MJ, Kingston JK, Hines MT: Effects of training on maximum oxygen consumption of ponies. Am J Vet Res 2000, 61(8):986-991.
• [23]Clayton HM: Heart rate monitoring. In Conditioning sport horses. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada: Sport horse publications; 1991.
• [24]Serrano MG, Evans DL, Hodgson JL: Heart rate and blood lactate responses during exercise in preparation for eventing competition. Equine Vet J 2002, 34(Suppl 34):135-139.
• [25]Bailey CJ, Reid SWJ, Hodgson DR, Bourke JM, Rose RJ: Flat, hurdle and steeple racing: risk factors for musculoskeletal injury. Equine Vet J 1998, 30:498-503.
• [26]Murray RC, Walters JM, Snart H, Dyson SJ, Parkin TDH: Identification of risk factors for lameness in dressage horses. Vet J 2010, 184:27-36.
• [27]Persson SG: Evaluation of exercise tolerance and fitness in the performance horse. In Equine Exerc Physiol. Cambridge: Granta Editions, ICEEP Publications; 1987:441-457.
• [28]Hargeaves BJ, Kronfeld DS, Naylor JRJ: Ambient temperature and relative humidity influenced packed cell volume, total plasma protein and other variables in horses during an incremental submaximal field exercise test. Equine Vet J 1999, 31(4):314-318.
• [29]Sloet Van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM, Wensing TH, Barneveld A, Breukink HJ: Work-load in the horse during vaulting competition. Equine Exerc Physiol 1991, 3:331-336.
• [30]Baumann J, Holzhausen H, Leinker S, Martens S, Weddige I: Comparison of heart rate, lactate and velocity between training and competition in 3- to 4-star eventing horses. In In proceedings of the 7th ISES Conference. The Netherlands: Hooge Mierde; 2011:81.