Dietary use and conservation concern of edible wetland plants at indo-burma hotspot: a case study from northeast India

Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine

RC Sundriyal¹  HB Singh³  PB Kanjilal²  R Kotoky²  S Roshnibala³  M Sundriyal¹  A Jain³ 

[1] G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment & Development, Kosi-Katarmal, Almora, Uttarakhand-263643, India;North-East Institute of Science and Technology (CSIR), Jorhat 785 006, India;North-East Institute of Science and Technology (CSIR), Substation, Imphal 795004, India

关键词: conservation;    nutritive value;    marketing;    livelihood;    ethnobotanical survey;    dietary use;    tribal communities;    Wetland plant resources;   

Others  :  865506
DOI  :  10.1186/1746-4269-7-29

 received in 2011-04-05, accepted in 2011-10-04,  发布年份 2011

【 摘 要 】

Background

The wetlands of the North East India fall among the global hotspots of biodiversity. However, they have received very little attention with relation to their intrinsic values to human kind; therefore their conservation is hardly addressed. These wetlands are critical for the sustenance of the tribal communities.

Methods

Field research was conducted during 2003 to 2006 in seven major wetlands of four districts of Manipur state, Northeast India (viz. Imphal-East, Imphal-West, Thoubal, and Bishnupur). A total of 224 wetland-plant-collectors were interviewed for the use and economics of species using semi-structured questionnaires and interview schedules. Imphal, Bishenpur and Thoubal markets were investigated in detail for influx and consumption pattern of these plants. The collectors were also inquired for medicinal use of wetland species. Nutritive values of 21 species were analyzed in laboratory. The vouchers were collected for all the species and deposited in the CSIR-NEIST (Formerly Regional Research Laboratory), Substation, Lamphelpat, Imphal, Manipur, India.

Results

We recorded 51 edible wetland species used by indigenous people for food and medicinal purposes. Thirty eight species had high medicinal values and used in the traditional system to treat over 22 diseases. At least 27 species were traded in three markets studied (i.e. Imphal, Thoubal and Bishenpur), involving an annual turnover of 113 tons of wetland edible plants and a gross revenue of Rs. 907, 770/- (US$1 = Rs. 45/-). The Imphal market alone supplies 60% of the total business. Eighty per cent of the above mentioned species are very often used by the community. The community has a general opinion that the availability of 45% species has depleted in recent times, 15 species need consideration for conservation while another 7 species deserved immediate protection measures. The nutrient analysis showed that these species contribute to the dietary balance of tribal communities.

Conclusions

Considering the importance of wild wetland plants in local sustenance, it is suggested to protect their habitats, develop domestication protocols of selected species, and build programs for the long-term management of wetland areas by involving local people. Some medicinal plants may also be used to develop into modern medicines.

【 授权许可】

   
2011 Jain et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Maltby E, Turner RE: Wetlands are not wastelands. Geogra Manage LV 1983, 92-97.
• [2]SACONH: Inland Wetlands of India-Conservation Atlas. Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, Coimbatore, India; 2004.
• [3]Taft OW, Haig SM: The value of agricultural wetlands as invertebrate resources for wintering shorebirds. Agric Ecosys Environ 2005, 110:249-256.
• [4]Sugunan VV: Reservoirs and Fishes of India. FAO, Fish Technical Paper 1995, 345:1-423.
• [5]SACONH: Inland Wetlands of India-Conservation Priorities. Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, Coimbatore, India; 2004.
• [6]Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Da Fonseca GAB, Kent J: Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 2000, 403:853-858.
• [7]FSI: State of Forest Report 2001. Forest Survey of India (FSI), Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India; 2001.
• [8]MRSAC: Wetland Point Data. Manipur Remote Sensing Application Centre (MRSAC), Imphal, Manipur, India; 1997.
• [9]SAC: Wetlands of India. Project Report: Space Application Centre (SAC), RSAM/SAC/RESA/PR/01/98, Ahmadabad; 1998:1-239.
• [10]Trisal CL, Manihar T: Management of Phumdis in Loktak lake. In Proceeding of workshop on Management of Phumdis in Loktak lake. Edited by Trisal CL, Manihar T. Imphal, India; 2006. 2002
• [11]Singh MP: Ecology of Loktak lake with special reference to fish and fisheries of the lake. In PhD Thesis. Manipur University, India; 1998.
• [12]Jain A, Singh RS, Kanjilal PB, Singh HB: Impact of canalization and relationship of land-use cover change with the lake nutrient of Sanapat lake in Manipur, northeastern India. Eco Envir Conse 2005, 11(3-4):569-575.
• [13]Devi ID: Ecological studies of the fresh water macrophytes in Utarapat lake, Manipur. In PhD Thesis. Manipur University, India; 1998.
• [14]Singh MJ: Limnological studies of Pumlen lake - A major wetland of Manipur. In PhD Thesis. Manipur University, India; 1998.
• [15]Nivanonee C: Vegetation structure and primary production of the macrophytes in Ikop lake, Manipur. In PhD Thesis. Manipur University, India; 2002.
• [16]Devi OI: Distribution, primary production and nutrient status of the macrophytic communities in Waithou lake, Manipur. In PhD Thesis. Manipur University, India; 1993.
• [17]Usha K: Macrophytic ecology of Poiroupat lake, Manipur. In PhD Thesis. Manipur University, India; 2002.
• [18]Sundriyal M, Sundriyal RC, Sharma E: Dietary use of wild plant resources in the Sikkim Himalaya, India. Eco Bot 2004, 58(4):626-638.
• [19]Martin GJ: Ethnobotany - A Methods Manual. Chapman and Hall, London, UK; 1995.
• [20]Sundriyal M, Sundriyal RC: Wild edible plants of the Sikkim Himalaya: Marketing, value addition and implications for management. Eco Bot 2004, 58(2):300-315.
• [21]Goday R, Bawa KS: The economic value and sustainable harvest of plants and animals from the tropical forests: assumption, hypothesis and methods. Eco Bot 1993, 52:316-319.
• [22]Goday R, Lubowaski R: Guidelines for the economic valuation of non-timber tropical forest products. Curr Anthro 1992, 33:423-433.
• [23]Philips O: The potential for harvesting fruits in tropical rainforest: New data from Amazonian Peru. Biod Conser 1993, 2:18-38.
• [24]Sinha SC: Medicinal Plants of Manipur. Sinha & Mass Publication, Imphal, India; 1996.
• [25]BSI: Flora of Manipur. Volume 1. Botanical Survey of India (BSI), Kolkata, India; 2000.
• [26]Singh HB, Singh RS, Sandhu JS: Herbal Medicine of Manipur - A Colour Encyclopaedia. Daya Publishing House, New Delhi, India; 2003.
• [27]Rangana SC: Manual of Analysis of Fruits and Vegetable Products. Tata McGraw Hill, New Delhi, India; 1979.
• [28]Allen SE: Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials. 2nd edition. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London; 1989.
• [29]Anderson JM, Ingram JSI: Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility: A Handbook of Method. 2nd edition. CAB International, Wallingford, UK; 1993.
• [30]Jain A, Singh RS, Singh HB: Economic evaluation of lotus Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn. cultivation in Sanapat lake, Manipur Valley. Natural Prod Radi 2004, 3:418-421.
• [31]Jain A, Roshnibala S, Rajshree K, Sharma HN, Kanjilal PB, Singh HB: Matting rush (Schoenoplectus lacustris (Linn.) Palla): Status, utility, threat, cultivation and conservation options in Manipur. Curr Sci 2005, 89:1018-1021.
• [32]Singh HB, Puni L, Jain A, Singh RS, Rao PG: Status, utility threats and conservation options for rattan resources in Manipur. Curr Sci 2004, 87:90-94.
• [33]Ravindranath NH, Rao S, Sharma N, Nair M, Gopalakrishnan R, Rao AS, Malaviya S, Tiwari R, Sagadevan A, Munsi M, Krishna N, Bala G: Climate change vulnerability profiles for North East, India. Curr Sci 2011, 101(3):1-11.
• [34]Misra S, Maikhuri RK, Kala CP, Rao KS, Saxena KG: Wild leafy vegetables: A study of their subsistence dietetic support to the inhabitants of Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, India. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 2008, 4:15. BioMed Central Full Text
• [35]Sundriyal M, Sundriyal RC: Wild edible plants of the Sikkim Himalaya: Nutritive values. Eco Bot 2001, 55(3):313-334.
• [36]Sundriyal M, Sundriyal RC: Underutilized edible plants of Sikkim Himalaya: Needs for domestication. Curr Sci 2003, 85:731-736.
• [37]Kala CP: Ethnomedicinal botany of the Apatani in the eastern Himalayan region of India. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 2005, 1:11. BioMed Central Full Text
• [38]Srivastava RC, Singh RK, Mukherjee TK: Bioculturally important rare new plant species of Heteropanax Seems (Araliaceae) from Eastern Himalaya, Arunachal Pradesh. Indian J Tradi Knowle 2010, 9(2):242-244.
• [39]Singh RK, Srivastava RC, Community Adi, Mukherjee TK: Toko-Patta (Livistona jenkinsiana Griff) Adi community and conservation of culturally important endangered tree species in eastern Himalaya. Indian J Tradi Knowl 2010, 9(2):231-241.
• [40]Ramakrishnan PS: Shifting Agriculture and Sustainable Development: An Interdisciplinary Study of Northeastern India. UNESCO-MAB Series, Paris, Parthenon, Publication, UK; 1992.