期刊论文详细信息
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
The metabolic cost of lowering blood pressure with hydrochlorothiazide
Lidia S Szczepaniak1  Ronald G Victor1  Jaime Wiebel2  Edward W Szczepaniak1  Ildiko Lingvay2  Angela L Price2 
[1] Cedars -Sinai Medical Center, The Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA;Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
关键词: Insulin secretion;    Insulin sensitivity;    Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy;    Hydrochlorothiazide;    Valsartan;    Type 2 diabetes;   
Others  :  812727
DOI  :  10.1186/1758-5996-5-35
 received in 2013-07-09, accepted in 2013-07-05,  发布年份 2013
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

The landmark Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering treatment to prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) placed a new spotlight on thiazide diuretics as the first-line therapy for hypertension. This is concerning as thiazide-diuretics may contribute to comorbidities associated with the current epidemic of obesity. Previous randomized clinical trials have linked thiazide diuretic treatment to insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, and increased incidence of type 2 diabetes.

Methods

This proof of concept, longitudinal, randomized, double–blind study evaluated the effects of the angiotensin II receptor blocker Valsartan and the specific thiazide diuretic Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) on hepatic triglyceride level (primary outcome), as well as triglyceride levels within other organs including the heart, skeletal muscle, and pancreas. Additionally, we evaluated whether myocardial function, insulin sensitivity, and insulin secretion were affected by these treatments.

Results

Hepatic TG levels increased by 57% post HCTZ treatment: ∆hTG HCTZ = 4.12% and remained unchanged post Valsartan treatment: ∆hTG V = 0.06%. The elevation of hepatic TG levels after HCTZ treatment was additionally accompanied by a reduction in insulin sensitivity: ∆SI HCTZ = -1.14. Treatment with Valsartan resulted in improved insulin sensitivity: ∆SI V = 1.24. Treatment-induced changes in hepatic TG levels and insulin sensitivity were statistically significant between groups (phTG = 0.0098 and pSI = 0.0345 respectively). Disposition index, DI, remained unchanged after HCTZ treatment: ∆DI HCTZ = -141 but it was increased by a factor of 2 after treatment with Valsartan: ∆DI V =1018). However, the change between groups was not statistically significant. Both therapies did not modify abdominal visceral and subcutaneous fat mass as well as myocardial structure and function. Additionally, myocardial, pancreatic, and skeletal muscle triglyceride deposits remained unchanged in both therapeutic arms.

Conclusions

Our findings are two-fold and relate to hepatic steatosis and insulin sensitivity. HCTZ treatment worsened hepatic steatosis measured as hepatic triglyceride content and reduced insulin sensitivity. Valsartan treatment did not affect hepatic triglyceride levels and improved insulin sensitivity. The results of this study reinforce the message that in patients at risk for type 2 diabetes it is particularly important to choose an antihypertensive regimen that lowers blood pressure without exacerbating patient’s metabolic profile.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Price et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140709093721511.pdf 491KB PDF download
Figure 3. 15KB Image download
Figure 2. 43KB Image download
Figure 1. 18KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Barzilay JI, Davis BR, Cutler JA, Pressel SL, Whelton PK, Basile J, Margolis KL, Ong ST, Sadler LS, Summerson J: Fasting glucose levels and incident diabetes mellitus in older nondiabetic adults randomized to receive 3 different classes of antihypertensive treatment: a report from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). Arch Intern Med 2006, 166:2191-2201.
  • [2]Stump CS, Hamilton MT, Sowers JR: Effect of antihypertensive agents on the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Mayo Clin Proc 2006, 81:796-806.
  • [3]Elliott WJ, Meyer PM: Incident diabetes in clinical trials of antihypertensive drugs: a network meta-analysis. Lancet 2007, 369:201-207.
  • [4]Gerstein HC, Yusuf S, Bosch J, Pogue J, Sheridan P, Dinccag N, Hanefeld M, Hoogwerf B, Laakso M, Mohan V, Shaw J, Zinman B, Holman RR: Effect of rosiglitazone on the frequency of diabetes in patients with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006, 368:1096-1105.
  • [5]Basile JN: Antihypertensive therapy, new-onset diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Int J Clin Pract 2009, 63:656-666.
  • [6]Califf RM, Boolell M, Haffner SM, Bethel MA, McMurray J, Duggal A, Holman RR: Prevention of diabetes and cardiovascular disease in patients with impaired glucose tolerance: rationale and design of the Nateglinide and Valsartan in Impaired Glucose Tolerance Outcomes Research (NAVIGATOR) Trial. Am Heart J 2008, 156:623-632.
  • [7]Karnes JH, Cooper-DeHoff RM: Antihypertensive medications: benefits of blood pressure lowering and hazards of metabolic effects. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2009, 7:689-702.
  • [8]Kurtz TW, Pravenec M: Antidiabetic mechanisms of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists: beyond the renin-angiotensin system. J Hypertens 2004, 22:2253-2261.
  • [9]Sharma AM, Janke J, Gorzelniak K, Engeli S, Luft FC: Angiotensin Blockade Prevents Type 2 Diabetes by Formation of Fat Cells. Hypertension 2002, 40:609-611.
  • [10]Nathan DM, Davidson MB, DeFronzo RA, Heine RJ, Henry RR, Pratley R, Zinman B: Impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance: implications for care. Diabetes Care 2007, 30:753-759.
  • [11]Bergman RN: Lilly Lecture 1989. Toward Physiological Understanding of Glucose Tolerance. Minimal-Model Approach. Diabetes 1989, 38:1512-1527.
  • [12]Boesch C, Slotboom J, Hoppeler H, Kreis R: In vivo determination of intra-myocellular lipids in human muscle by means of localized 1H-MR-spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 1997, 37:484-493.
  • [13]Schick F, Eismann B, Jung WI, Bongers H, Bunse M, Lutz O: Comparison of localized proton NMR signals of skeletal muscle and fat tissue in vivo: two lipid compartments in muscle tissue. Magn Reson Med 1993, 29:158-167.
  • [14]Szczepaniak LS, Babcock EE, Schick F, Dobbins RL, Garg A, Burns DK, McGarry JD, Stein DT: Measurement of intracellular triglyceride stores by H spectroscopy: validation in vivo. Am J Physiol 1999, 276:E977-E989.
  • [15]Szczepaniak LS, Dobbins RL, Stein DT, McGarry JD: Bulk magnetic susceptibility effects on the assessment of intra- and extramyocellular lipids in vivo. Magn Reson Med 2002, 47:607-610.
  • [16]Szczepaniak LS, Dobbins RL, Metzger GJ, Sartoni-D’Ambrosia G, Arbique D, Vongpatanasin W, Unger R, Victor RG: Myocardial triglycerides and systolic function in humans: in vivo evaluation by localized proton spectroscopy and cardiac imaging. Magn Reson Med 2003, 49:417-423.
  • [17]Szczepaniak LS, Nurenberg P, Leonard D, Browning JD, Reingold JS, Grundy S, Hobbs HH, Dobbins RL: Magnetic resonance spectroscopy to measure hepatic triglyceride content: prevalence of hepatic steatosis in the general population. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2005, 288:E462-E468.
  • [18]McGavock JM, Victor RG, Unger RH, Szczepaniak LS: Adiposity of the heart, revisited. Ann Intern Med 2006, 144:517-524.
  • [19]McGavock JM, Lingvay I, Zib I, Tillery T, Salas N, Unger R, Levine BD, Raskin P, Victor RG, Szczepaniak LS: Cardiac steatosis in diabetes mellitus: a 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Circulation 2007, 116:1170-1175.
  • [20]Reingold JS, McGavock JM, Kaka S, Tillery T, Victor RG, Szczepaniak LS: Determination of triglyceride in the human myocardium by magnetic resonance spectroscopy: reproducibility and sensitivity of the method. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2005, 289:E935-E939.
  • [21]Lingvay I, Raskin P, Szczepaniak LS: The fatty hearts of patients with diabetes. Nat Rev Cardiol 2009, 6:268-269.
  • [22]Lingvay I, Esser V, Legendre JL, Price AL, Wertz KM, Adams-Huet B, Zhang S, Unger RH, Szczepaniak LS: Noninvasive quantification of pancreatic fat in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009, 94:4070-4076.
  • [23]Abate N, Garg A, Peshock RM, Stray-Gundersen J, Grundy SM: Relationships of generalized and regional adiposity to insulin sensitivity in men. J Clin Invest 1995, 96:88-98.
  • [24]Eriksson JW, Jansson PA, Carlberg B, Hagg A, Kurland L, Svensson MK, Ahlstrom H, Strom C, Lonn L, Ojbrandt K, Johansson L, Lind L: Hydrochlorothiazide, but not candesartan, aggravates insulin resistance and causes visceral and hepatic fat accumulation: the Mechanisms for the Diabetes Preventing Effect of Candesartan (MEDICA) Study. Hypertension 2008, 52:1030-1037.
  • [25]Sharma AM: Does it matter how blood pressure is lowered in patients with metabolic risk factors? J Am Soc Hypertens 2008, (4):S23-S29.
  • [26]Bakris G, Molitch M, Hewkin A, Kipnes M, Sarafidis P, Fakouhi K, Bacher P, Sowers J: Differences in glucose tolerance between fixed-dose antihypertensive drug combinations in people with metabolic syndrome. Diab Care 2006, 29:2592-2597.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:47次 浏览次数:10次